Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T10:56:38.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physics of rotation: problems and challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Andre Maeder  and
Georges Meynet
Andre Maeder
Affiliation:
Geneva Observatory, University of Geneva email: [email protected]
Georges Meynet
Affiliation:
Geneva Observatory, University of Geneva email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We examine some debated points in current discussions about rotating stars: the shape, the gravity darkening, the critical velocities, the mass loss rates, the hydrodynamical instabilities, the internal mixing and N–enrichments. The study of rotational mixing requires high quality data and careful analysis. From recent studies where such conditions are fulfilled, rotational mixing is well confirmed. Magnetic coupling with stellar winds may produce an apparent contradiction, i.e. stars with a low rotation and a high N–enrichment. We point out that it rather confirms the large role of shears in differentially rotating stars for the transport processes. New models of interacting binaries also show how shears and mixing may be enhanced in close binaries which are either spun up or down by tidal interactions.

Keywords

Stellar PhysicsStellar rotationStellar evolution
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 9 , Issue S307: New windows on massive stars: asteroseismology, interferometry, and spectropolarimetry , June 2014 , pp. 9 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2015 

References

Aerts, C., Molenberghs, G., Kenward, M. G., & Neiner, C. 2014, ApJ 781, 88Google Scholar
Beck, P. G., Montalban, J., Kallinger, T., et al. 2012, Nature 481, 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, L., Koester, D., Napiwotzki, R., Reid, I. N., & Zuckerman, B. 2005, A&A 444, 565Google Scholar
Bouret, J.-C., Lanz, T., Martins, F., et al. 2013, A&A 555, A1Google Scholar
Brott, I., de Mink, S. E., Cantiello, M., et al. 2011a, A&A 530, A115Google Scholar
Brott, I., Evans, C. J., Hunter, I., et al. 2011b, A&A 530, A116Google Scholar
Carciofi, A. C., Domiciano de Souza, A., Magalhães, A. M., Bjorkman, J. E., & Vakili, F. 2008, ApJ (Letters) 676, L41Google Scholar
Ceillier, T., Eggenberger, P., García, R. A., & Mathis, S. 2013, A&A 555, A54Google Scholar
Che, X., Monnier, J. D., Zhao, M., et al. 2011, ApJ 732, 68Google Scholar
Claret, A. 2012, A&A 538, A3Google Scholar
Deheuvels, S., Doğan, G., Goupil, M. J., et al. 2014, A&A 564, A27Google Scholar
Deheuvels, S., García, R. A., Chaplin, W. J., et al. 2012, ApJ 756, 19Google Scholar
Delaa, O., Zorec, J., Domiciano de Souza, A., et al. 2013, A&A 555, A100Google Scholar
Domiciano de Souza, A., Kervella, P., Jankov, S., et al. 2003, A&A 407, L47Google Scholar
Eggenberger, P., Montalbán, J., & Miglio, A. 2012, A&A 544, L4Google Scholar
Ekström, S., Georgy, C., Eggenberger, P., et al. 2012, A&A 537, A146Google Scholar
Georgy, C., Ekström, S., Eggenberger, P., et al. 2013, A&A 558, A103Google Scholar
Heger, A., Woosley, S. E., Langer, N., & Spruit, H. C. 2004, in Maeder, A. & Eenens, P. (eds.), Stellar Rotation, Vol. 215 of IAU Symposium, p. 591Google Scholar
Hirschi, R., Meynet, G., & Maeder, A. 2005, A&A 443, 581Google Scholar
Hunter, I., Brott, I., Langer, N., et al. 2009, A&A 496, 841 (H+09)Google Scholar
Hunter, I., Dufton, P. L., Smartt, S. J., et al. 2007, A&A 466, 277Google Scholar
Kervella, P. & Domiciano de Souza, A. 2006, A&A 453, 1059Google Scholar
Lucy, L. B. 1967, ZfA 65, 89Google Scholar
Maeder, A. 1999, A&A 347, 185Google Scholar
Maeder, A. 2009, Physics, Formation and Evolution of Rotating StarsGoogle Scholar
Maeder, A., Grebel, E. K., & Mermilliod, J.-C. 1999, A&A 346, 459Google Scholar
Maeder, A. & Meynet, G. 2001, A&A 373, 555Google Scholar
Maeder, A. & Meynet, G. 2012, Reviews of Modern Physics 84, 25Google Scholar
Maeder, A., Meynet, G., Ekström, S., & Georgy, C. 2009, Communications in Asteroseismology 158, 72Google Scholar
Maeder, A., Meynet, G., Lagarde, N., & Charbonnel, C. 2013, A&A 553, A1Google Scholar
Maeder, A., Przybilla, N., Nieva, M.-F., et al. 2014, A&A 565, A39Google Scholar
Marques, J. P., Goupil, M. J., Lebreton, Y., et al. 2013, A&A 549, A74Google Scholar
Martayan, C., Frémat, Y., Hubert, A.-M., et al. 2007, A&A 462, 683Google Scholar
Meynet, G., Eggenberger, P., & Maeder, A. 2011, A&A 525, L11Google Scholar
Müller, P. E. & Vink, J. S. 2014, A&A 564, A57Google Scholar
Pauldrach, A., Puls, J., & Kudritzki, R. P. 1986, A&A 164, 86Google Scholar
Przybilla, N., Firnstein, M., Nieva, M. F., Meynet, G., & Maeder, A. 2010, A&A 517, A38Google Scholar
Song, H. F., Maeder, A., Meynet, G., et al. 2013, A&A 556, A100Google Scholar
Spruit, H. C. 2002, A&A 381, 923Google Scholar
Tayar, J. & Pinsonneault, M. H. 2013, ApJ (Letters) 775, L1Google Scholar
ud-Doula, A. & Owocki, S. P. 2002, ApJ 576, 413Google Scholar
Ud-Doula, A., Owocki, S. P., & Townsend, R. H. D. 2008, MNRAS 385, 97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Zeipel, H. 1924, MNRAS 84, 665Google Scholar
Zahn, J.-P., Brun, A. S., & Mathis, S. 2007, A&A 474, 145Google Scholar
Zahn, J.-P., Ranc, C., & Morel, P. 2010, A&A 517, A7Google Scholar
Zhao, M., Monnier, J. D., Pedretti, E., et al. 2009, ApJ 701, 209Google Scholar