Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:13:15.000Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

OSIRIS View of Submillimeter Galaxies: A 2–D Spectroscopic Insight to Starburst Galaxies in the High-Redshift Universe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2010

K. Menéndez-Delmestre ,
A. W. Blain ,
M. Swinbank ,
I. Smail ,
S. C. Chapman  and
R. J. Ivison
K. Menéndez-Delmestre
Affiliation:
NSF Astronomy and Astrophysics Postdoctoral Fellow, Carnegie Observatories, 813 Santa Barbara St., Pasadena, CA 91101, USA Email: [email protected]
A. W. Blain
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, MC 105-24, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
M. Swinbank
Affiliation:
Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
I. Smail
Affiliation:
Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
S. C. Chapman
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, UK
R. J. Ivison
Affiliation:
UK Astronomy Technology Centre, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK Institute for Astronomy, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Ultra-luminous infrared galaxies (LIR > 1012L⊙) are locally rare, but appear to dominate the co-moving energy density at higher redshifts (z > 2). Many of these are optically faint, dust-obscured galaxies that have been identified by the detection of their thermal dust emission in the sub-mm. Multi-wavelength spectroscopic follow-up observations of these sub-mm galaxies (SMGs) have shown that they are massive (Mstellar ~ 1011M⊙) objects undergoing intense star-formation (SFRs ~ 102–103M⊙ yr−1) with a mean redshift of z ~ 2, coinciding with the epoch of peak quasar activity. Furthermore, the presence of AGNs in ~ 28–50% of SMGs has been unveiled in the X-ray and near-IR. When both AGN and star-formation activity are present, long-slit spectroscopic techniques face difficulties in disentangling their independent contributions from integrated spectra. We have observed Hα emission from a sample of three SMGs in the redshift range z ~ 1.4–2.4 with the integral field spectrograph OSIRIS on Keck, in conjunction with Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics. The spatially resolved, two-dimensional spectroscopic insight that these observations provide is the only viable probe of the spatial distribution and line-of-sight motion of ionized gas within these galaxies. We detect multiple galactic-scale sub-components, distinguishing the compact, broad Hα emission arising from an AGN from the more extended narrow-line emission of star-forming regions spreading over ~ 8–17 kpc. We explore the dynamics of gas in the inner galaxy halo to improve our understanding of the internal dynamics of this enigmatic galaxy population. We find no evidence of ordered orbital motion such as would be found in a gaseous disk, but rather large velocity offsets of a few hundred kilometers per second between distinct galactic-scale sub-components. Considering the disturbed morphology of SMGs, these sub-components are likely remnants of originally independent gas-rich galaxies that are in the process of merging, hence triggering the ultraluminous SMG phase.

Keywords

galaxies: high-redshiftgalaxies: starburstgalaxies: activegalaxies: kinematicsdynamicstechniques: spectroscopic
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 5 , Symposium S267: Co-Evolution of Central Black Holes and Galaxies , August 2009 , pp. 46 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Alexander, D. M., Bauer, F. E., Chapman, S., Smail, I., Blain, A., Brandt, W. N., Ivison, R. 2005, ApJ, 632, 736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, D. M., et al. 2008, AJ, 135, 1968Google Scholar
Barger, A. J., Cowie, L. L., & Sanders, D. B. 1999, ApJ, 518, L5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertoldi, F., et al. 2000, A&A, 360, 92Google Scholar
Blain, A., Kneib, J.-P., Ivison, R., & Smail, I. 1999, ApJ, 512, L87Google Scholar
Borys, C., Chapman, S., Halpern, M., & Scott, D. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 385Google Scholar
Borys, C., Smail, I., Chapman, S. C., Blain, A. W., Alexander, D. M., & Ivison, R. J. 2005, ApJ, 635, 853Google Scholar
Bouché, N., Lehnert, M. D., Aguirre, A., Péroux, C., & Bergeron, J. 2007, MNRAS, 378, 525Google Scholar
Chapman, S., Blain, A., Smail, I., & Ivison, R. 2005, ApJ, 622, 772 (C05)Google Scholar
Coppin, K., Halpern, M., Scott, D., Borys, C., & Chapman, S. 2005, MNRAS, 357, 1022Google Scholar
Cowie, L. L., Barger, A. J., & Kneib, J.-P. 2002, AJ, 123, 2197Google Scholar
Eales, S., Lilly, S., Gear, W., Dunne, L., Bond, J. R., Hammer, F., Le Fèvre, O., & Crampton, D. 1999, ApJ, 515, 518Google Scholar
Erb, D. K., Shapley, A. E., Steidel, C. C., Pettini, M., Adelberger, K. L., Hunt, M. P., Moorwood, A. F. M., & Cuby, J.-G. 2003, ApJ, 591, 101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster Schreiber, N. M., et al. 2009, ApJ, 706, 1364Google Scholar
Greve, T. R., et al. 2005, MNRAS, 359, 1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivison, R. J., Smail, I., Le Borgne, J.-F., Blain, A. W., Kneib, J.-P., Bezecourt, J., Kerr, T. H., & Davies, J. K. 1998, MNRAS, 298, 583Google Scholar
Ivison, R. J., et al. 2002, MNRAS, 337, 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, D. R., et al. 2009, ApJ 697, 2057Google Scholar
Lilly, S. J., Eales, S. A., Gear, W. K. P., Hammer, F., Le Fèvre, O., Crampton, D., Bond, J. R., & Dunne, L. 1999, ApJ, 518, 641Google Scholar
Nesvadba, N. P. H., et al. 2007, ApJ, 657, 725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puchnarewicz, E. M., et al. 1997, MNRAS, 291, 177Google Scholar
Sanders, D. B. & Mirabel, I. F. 1996, ARAA, 34, 749Google Scholar
Sanders, D. B., Soifer, B. T., Elias, J. H., Madore, B. F., Matthews, K., Neugebauer, G., & Scoville, N. Z. 1988, ApJ, 325, 74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, S., et al. 2002, MNRAS, 331, 817Google Scholar
Smail, I., Ivison, R., & Blain, A. 1997, ApJ, 490L, 5SGoogle Scholar
Smail, I., Ivison, R. J., Blain, A. W., & Kneib, J.-P. 1998, ApJ, 507, L21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smail, I., Chapman, S. C., Blain, A. W., & Ivison, R. J. 2004, ApJ, 616, 71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steidel, C. C., Adelberger, K. L., Shapley, A. E., Pettini, M., Dickinson, M., & Giavalisco, M. 2003, ApJ, 592, 728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinbank, A. M., Smail, I., Chapman, S., Blain, A., Ivison, R., & Keel, W. C. 2004, ApJ, 617, 64Google Scholar
Swinbank, A. M., Chapman, S. C., Smail, I., Lindner, C., Borys, C., Blain, A. W., Ivison, R. J., & Lewis, G. F. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 465Google Scholar
Tacconi, L. J., et al. 2008, ApJ, 680, 246Google Scholar
Takata, T., Sekiguchi, K., Smail, I., Chapman, S., Geach, J. E., Swinbank, A. M., Blain, A., Ivison, R. 2006, ApJ, 651, 713Google Scholar
Tecza, M., et al. 2004, ApJ, 605, L109Google Scholar
Webb, T. M. A., Lilly, S., Clements, D. L., Eales, S., Yun, M., Brodwin, M., Dunne, L., & Gear, W. 2003b, ApJ, 597, 680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, J. S. & Scoville, N. Z. 1991, ARAA, 29, 581Google Scholar
Younger, J. D., et al. 2007, ApJ, 671, 1531CrossRefGoogle Scholar