Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:51:41.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Orbital fitting of Fomalhaut b and subsequent interaction with the dust belt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2015

Hervé Beust
Affiliation:
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IPAG, B. P. 53, F-38041 Grenoble, France email: [email protected]
Virginie Faramaz
Affiliation:
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IPAG, B. P. 53, F-38041 Grenoble, France email: [email protected]
Jean-Charles Augereau
Affiliation:
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IPAG, B. P. 53, F-38041 Grenoble, France email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Fomalhaut harbours a moderately eccentric dust belt with a planet candidate (Fom b) imaged near its inner edge. MCMC-based orbital determination of Fom b shows that the orbit is highly eccentric (e≃0.9), nearly apsidally aligned with the belt. We study the secular interaction between the planet and the dust ring. We show that only if it is a small mass object, Fom b can perturb the belt without destroying it. But Fom b's perturbing action inevitably drives the belt to high eccentricity and apsidal misalignment. This behaviour is due to the planet's high eccentricity.

This dynamical outcome contradicts both observations and orbital determination. We conclude that another, more massive and less eccentric planet (Fom c) is required to dynamically control the belt. We show that Fom b is likely to have been formerly trapped in mean-motion resonance with Fom c and that subsequent eccentricity increase caused it to cross Fom c's orbit and to jump on its present day orbit via a scattering event.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Beust, H. & Morbidelli, A. 1996, Icarus 120, 358Google Scholar
Beust, H., Augereau, J.-C., & Bonsor, A., et al. 2014, A&A 561, A43Google Scholar
Chiang, E. I., Kite, E., Kalas, P., Graham, J. R.,& Clampin, M. 2009, ApJ 693, 734Google Scholar
Faramaz, V., Beust, H., Augereau, J.-C., et al. 2014, A&A in press, ArXiv:1409.6868Google Scholar
Graham, J. R., Fitzgerald, M. P., & Kalas, P., Clampin, M. 2013, AAS 221, 324.03Google Scholar
Janson, M., Carson, J. C., Lafrenière, D., et al. 2012, ApJ 747, 116Google Scholar
Kalas, P. & Graham, J. R., Chiang, E.et al. 2005, Nature 435, 1067Google Scholar
Kalas, P. & Graham, J. R., Chiang, E.et al. 2008, Science 322, 1345Google Scholar
Kalas, P., Graham, J. R., Fitzgerald, M. P., Clampin, M. 2013, ApJ 775, 56Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. M. & Wyatt, M. C. 2011, MNRAS 412, 2137Google Scholar
Kenyon, S. J., Currie, T., & Bromley, B. C. 2014, ApJ 786, 70Google Scholar
Mamajek, E. E. 2012, ApJ 754, L20Google Scholar
Marengo, M., Stapelfeldt, K., Werner, M. W., et al. 2009, ApJ 700, 1647Google Scholar
Yoshikawa, M. 1989, A&A 213, 436Google Scholar