Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T12:10:22.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the role of magnetic reconnection in jet/accretion disk systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2010

Elisabete M. de Gouveia Dal Pino
Affiliation:
IAG, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão 1226, São Paulo 05508-900, [email protected]
Pamela Piovezan
Affiliation:
IAG, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão 1226, São Paulo 05508-900, [email protected] Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 1, Postfach 1317, D-85741 Garching, GermanyMPA, Garching, Germany
Luis Kadowaki
Affiliation:
IAG, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão 1226, São Paulo 05508-900, [email protected]
Grzegorz Kowal
Affiliation:
IAG, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão 1226, São Paulo 05508-900, [email protected]
Alex Lazarian
Affiliation:
Astronomy Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The most accepted model for jet production is based on the magneto-centrifugal acceleration out off an accretion disk that surrounds the central source (Blandford & Payne, 1982). This scenario, however, does not explain, e.g., the quasi-periodic ejection phenomena often observed in different astrophysical jet classes. de Gouveia Dal Pino & Lazarian (2005) (hereafter GDPL) have proposed that the large scale superluminal ejections observed in microquasars during radio flare events could be produced by violent magnetic reconnection (MR) episodes. Here, we extend this model to other accretion disk systems, namely: active galactic nuclei (AGNs) and young stellar objects (YSOs), and also discuss its hole on jet heating and particle acceleration.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Blandford, R. D. & Payne, D. G. 1982, MNRAS, 199, 883Google Scholar
de Gouvei ADal Pino, E. M. & Lazarian, A. 2005, A&A, 441, 845Google Scholar
de Gouvei ADal Pino, E. M., Piovezan, P., & Kadowaki, L. 2009, A&A submittedGoogle Scholar
Favata, F., Flaccomio, E., Reale, F., Micela, G., Sciortino, S., Shang, H., Stassun, K. G., & Feigelson, E. D. 2005, ApJS, 160, 469Google Scholar
Laor, A. & Behar, E., 2008, MNRAS, 390, 847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remillard, R. A. & McClintock, J. E. 2006, ARA&A, 44, 49Google Scholar
Soker, N. & Dil Vrtilek, S., [2009arXiv0904.]Google Scholar