Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T18:17:42.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the nature of the peculiar superthin LSB galaxy UGC 12281

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2012

Philip Günster  and
Dominik J. Bomans
Philip Günster
Affiliation:
Astronomisches Institut, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitässtraße 150, D-44801 Bochum, Germany email: [email protected], [email protected]
Dominik J. Bomans
Affiliation:
Astronomisches Institut, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitässtraße 150, D-44801 Bochum, Germany email: [email protected], [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

UGC 12281 has been classified as having a pure disk and being a low surface brightness galaxy (LSBG), thus being an obvious member of the so-called superthin galaxies. At the same time it represents an extremely untypical type of LSBG due to its remarkable amount of current star formation and evidence for extraplanar ionized gas. This makes it become a perfect tool to investigate the triggering of star formation in LSB galaxies, located in an alleged isolated area. By means of deep photometry and long-slit spectroscopy we analyse the Hα halo and verify the existence of a potential dwarf companion which we found on processed SDSS images.

Keywords

galaxies: evolutiongalaxies: dwarfgalaxies: halos
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 7 , Symposium S284: The Spectral Energy Distribution of Galaxies , September 2011 , pp. 138 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2012

References

Bertin, E. & Arnouts, S. 1996, A&AS, 117, 393Google Scholar
Goad, J. W. & Roberts, M. S. 1981, ApJ, 250, 79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmegreen, D. M., Elmegreen, B. G., & Sheets, C. M. 2004, ApJ, 603, 74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, E. 1958, Medd. Lunds. Astron. Obs., Ser II, 136, 1Google Scholar
Impey, C. & Bothun, G. 1997, ARAA, 35, 267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kautsch, S. J., Grebel, E. K., Barazza, F. D. & Gallagher, J. S. III 2006, A&A, 445, 765Google Scholar
Lokas, E. L. 2009, MNRAS, 394, L102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mateo, M. L. 1998, ARAA, 36, 435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, C. Y., Ho, L. C., Impey, C. D., & Rix, H.-W. 2010, AJ, 139, 2097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, S. D., Krusch, E., Bomans, D. J., & Dettmar, R.-J. 2009, A&A, 504, 807Google Scholar
Rossa, J. & Dettmar, R.-J. 2003, A&A, 406, 505Google Scholar
Sérsic, J. L. 1968, Atlas de galaxias australesGoogle Scholar
Warmels, R.-H. 1988, A&AS, 73, 453Google Scholar