Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:44:13.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On BLR Size Estimates in Reverberation Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2010

Alexander V. Melnikov
Affiliation:
Pulkovo Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Pulkovskoje Ave. 65, St. Petersburg 196140, Russia Email: [email protected], [email protected]
Ivan I. Shevchenko
Affiliation:
Pulkovo Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Pulkovskoje Ave. 65, St. Petersburg 196140, Russia Email: [email protected], [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Following the approach of Melnikov & Shevchenko (2008), we explore how the nonlinearity in the emission-line luminosity Ll of a broad-line region cloud, in its dependence on the ionizing continuum flux Fi incident on the cloud, affects estimates of the size of the broad-line region by means of cross-correlation methods. We show that the estimates obtained by straightforward cross-correlation of emission-line and continuum light curves can significantly underestimate the BLR size. We demonstrate examples of direct reverberation modelling of AGN emission-line light curves taking into account the nonlinearity of the “LlFi” relation. This nonlinearity allows one to explain the differences in the time lags for different lines. Cross-correlation estimates of the BLR size turn out to be small in comparison to the estimates obtained by the direct reverberation modelling.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Bentz, M. C., et al. 2006, ApJ, 651, 775Google Scholar
Kaspi, S., et al. 1996, ApJ, 470, 336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melnikov, A. V., & Shevchenko, I. I. 2008, MNRAS, 389, 478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, B. M., et al. 2002, ApJ, 581, 197CrossRefGoogle Scholar