Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:15:16.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

OH main line masers in the M 82 starburst

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2007

M. K. Argo
Affiliation:
Jodrell Bank Observatory, University of Manchester, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK11 9DL, UK
A. Pedlar
Affiliation:
Jodrell Bank Observatory, University of Manchester, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK11 9DL, UK
T. W. B. Muxlow
Affiliation:
Jodrell Bank Observatory, University of Manchester, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK11 9DL, UK
R. J. Beswick
Affiliation:
Jodrell Bank Observatory, University of Manchester, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK11 9DL, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A study of the distribution of OH gas in the central region of the nearby active starburst galaxy M82 has confirmed two previously known bright masers and revealed several new main line masers. Three of these are seen only at 1665 MHz, one is detected only at 1667 MHz, while the rest are detected in both lines. Observations covering both the 1665 and 1667 MHz lines, conducted with both the Very Large Array (VLA) and the Multi-Element Radio Linked Interferometer Network (MERLIN), have been used to accurately measure the positions and velocities of these features. This has allowed a comparison with catalogued continuum features in the starburst such as HII regions and supernova remnants, as well as known water and satellite line OH masers. Most of the main line masers appear to be associated with known HII regions although the two detected only at 1665 MHz are seen along the same line of sight as known supernova remnants.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Baudry, A. & Brouillet, N. 1996, A&A 316, 188Google Scholar
Caswell, J. L., Haynes, R. F. & Goss, W. M. 1980 Australian Journal of Physics 33, 639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, W. L., Hughes, S. M., Madore, B. F., Mould, J. R., Lee, M. G., Stetson, P., Kennicutt, R. C., Turner, A., Ferrarese, L., Ford, H., Graham, J. A., Hill, R., Hoessel, J. G., Huchra, J. & Illingworth, G. D. 1994, ApJ 427, 628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagiwara, Y. 2005, Ap&SS 295, 125Google Scholar
Kronberg, P. P. & Wilkinson, P. N. 1975, ApJ 200, 430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, A. R., Muxlow, T. W. B., Wills, K. A., Pedlar, A. & Beswick, R. J. 2002, MNRAS 334, 912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen-Q-Rieu, , Mebold, U., Winnberg, A., Guibert, J. & Booth, R. 1976, A&A 52, 467Google Scholar
Seaquist, E. R., Frayer, D. T. & Frail, D. A. 1997, ApJ 487, L131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, J. & Lo, K. Y. 1995, ApJL 445, L99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weliachew, L., Fomalont, E. B. & Greisen, E. W. 1984, A&A 137, 355Google Scholar
Wills, K. A., Das, M., Pedlar, A., Muxlow, T. W. B. & Robinson, T. G. 2000, MNRAS 316, 33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wills, K. A., Pedlar, A. & Muxlow, T. W. B. 2002, MNRAS 331, 313CrossRefGoogle Scholar