Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:47:42.702Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations of O vi Absorption from the Superbubbles of the Large Magellanic Cloud

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2014

Ananta C. Pradhan ,
Amit Pathak ,
Jayant Murthy  and
D. K. Ojha
Ananta C. Pradhan
Affiliation:
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai 400005, India, email: [email protected]
Amit Pathak
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Tezpur University, Tezpur 784028, India
Jayant Murthy
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Koramangala II block, Bangalore 560034, India
D. K. Ojha
Affiliation:
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai 400005, India, email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We have presented the observations of O VI absorption at 1032 Å towards 22 sightlines in 10 superbubbles (SBs) of the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) using the data obtained from the Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer (FUSE). The estimated abundance of O VI in the SBs varies from a minimum of (1.09 ±0.22)×1014 atoms/cm2 in SB N206 to a maximum of (3.71±0.23)×1014 atoms/cm2 in SB N70. We find about a 46% excess in the abundance of O VI in the SBs compared to the non-SB lines of sight. Even inside a SB, O VI column density (N(O VI)) varies by about a factor of 2 to 2.5. These data are useful in understanding the nature of the hot gas in SBs.

Keywords

Galaxies: Magellanic CloudsUltraviolet: generalISM: abundances
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 9 , Symposium S296: Supernova Environmental Impacts , January 2013 , pp. 388 - 389
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Borkowski, K. J., Balbus, S. A., & Fristrom, C. C. 1990, ApJ, 355, 501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaustad, J. E., McCullough, P. R., Rosing, W. & Van Buren, Dave 2001, PASP, 113, 1326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danforth, C. W., Shull, J. M., Rosenberg, J. L., & Stocke, J. T. 2006, ApJ, 640, 716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howk, J. C., Sembach, K. R., Savage, B. D., Massa, D., Friedman, S. D., & Fullerton, A. W. 2002, ApJ, 569, 214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pathak, Amit, Pradhan, A. C., Murthy, Jayant, & Sujatha, N. V. 2011, MNRAS, 412, 1105Google Scholar
Savage, B. D. & Sembach, K. R. 1991, ApJ, 379, 245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sembach, K. R. & Savage, B. D. 1992, ApJS, 83, 147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, R., McCray, R., Castor, J., Shapiro, P., & Moore, R. 1977, ApJ, 218, 377CrossRefGoogle Scholar