Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T02:43:21.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New Highly r-Process-Enhanced Halo Stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2018

Timothy C. Beers
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA, email: [email protected] JINA-CEE, Notre Dame, IN, USA
Erika M. Holmbeck
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA, email: [email protected] JINA-CEE, Notre Dame, IN, USA
Vinicius M. Placco
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA, email: [email protected] JINA-CEE, Notre Dame, IN, USA
Terese T. Hansen
Affiliation:
Carnegie Observatories, Pasadena, CA, USA
Joshua D. Simon
Affiliation:
Carnegie Observatories, Pasadena, CA, USA
Ian Thompson
Affiliation:
Carnegie Observatories, Pasadena, CA, USA
Anna Frebel
Affiliation:
MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
Charli M. Sakari
Affiliation:
University of Washington, WA, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There are roughly 25 very metal-poor (VMP; [Fe/H] < -2.0), highly r-process-enhanced (‘r-II’; [Eu/Fe] > + 1.0) stars currently known, discovered over the past 20+ years. These stars provide nearly pure signatures of r-process events early in the Galactic history. We are conducting a high-resolution follow-up survey of RAVE and other bright targets to identify a total of > 100 r-II stars. Our pilot runs on the du Pont 2.5-m at Las Campanas Observatory and the ARC 3.5-m at Apache Point Observatory have already identified up to fourteen new r-II stars. We are continuing our high-resolution follow-up efforts to constrain the astrophysical site(s) and nature of the r-process.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2018 

References

Arlandini, C., Käppeler, F., Wisshak, K., et al., 1999, ApJ, 525, 886Google Scholar
Beers, T. C., Norris, J. E., Placco, V. M., et al., 2014, ApJ, 794, 58Google Scholar
Frebel, A., Norris, J. E., Aoki, W., et al., 2007, ApJ, 658, 534Google Scholar
Hill, V., Plez, B., Cayrel, R., et al., 2002, A&A, 387, 560Google Scholar
Hill, V., Christlieb, N., Beers, T. C., et al. 2017, A&A, in press (arXiv:1608.07463)Google Scholar
Placco, V. M., Holmbeck, E. M., Frebel, A., et al., 2017, ApJ, 844, 18Google Scholar
Sneden, C., Cowan, J. J., & Gallino, R., 2008, ARAA, 46, 241Google Scholar
Steinmetz, M., Zwitter, T., Siebert, A., et al., 2006, AJ, 132, 1645Google Scholar