Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:12:56.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New era of LSST data: Estimating the physical properties of main-sequence galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2023

G. Riccio*
Affiliation:
National Centre for Nuclear Research, Astrophysics division ul. Pasteura 7, 02-093 Warszawa, Poland email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The main goal of the Vera C. Rubin observatory is to perform the 10 year Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST). This future state-of-art observatory will open the new window to study billions of galaxies from Local Universe as well as the high redshift objects. In this work we employ simulated LSST observations and uncertainties, based on the 50 385 real galaxies within the redshift range 0 < z < 2.5 from the ELAIS-N1 and COSMOS fields of the Herschel Extragalactic Legacy Project (HELP) survey, to constrain the physical properties of normal star-forming galaxies, such as their star formation rate (SFR), stellar mass (Mstar), and dust luminosity (Ldust). We fit their spectral energy distributions (SEDs) using the Code Investigating GALaxy Emission (CIGALE). The stellar masses estimated based on the LSST measurements agree with the full UV to far-IR SED, while we obtain a clear overestimate of the dust-related properties (SFR, Ldust) estimated with LSST. We investigate the cause of this result and find that it is necessary to employ auxiliary rest-frame mid-IR observations, simulated UV observations, or the far-UV attenuation (AFUV)-Mstar relation to correct for the overestimate.

Type
Poster Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Walcher, J., Groves, B., Budavári, T., & Dale, D., et al. 2011, Ap&SS, 331, 1 Google Scholar
Conroy, C., 2013, ARA&A, 51, 393 Google Scholar
Kennicutt, J., Robert, C., et al. 1998, A&A, 36, 189 Google Scholar
Bogdanoska, J., Burgarella, D., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 4, 5341 10.1093/mnras/staa1928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buat, V., et al. 2009, A&A, 507, 2, 693 Google Scholar
Eales, S., et al. 2010, PASP, 122, 891, 499 10.1086/653086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivezic, Z., et al. 2019, ApJ, 873, 2, 111 10.3847/1538-4357/ab042cCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laigle, C., et al. 2016, ApJS, 224, 2, 24 10.3847/0067-0049/224/2/24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, S., et al. 2000, MNRAS, 316, 4, 749 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03550.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, S. J., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 424, 3, 1614 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20912.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riccio, G., et al. 2021, A&A 653, A107 Google Scholar
Schreiber, C., et al. 2021, A&A 575, A74 Google Scholar
Shirley, R., et al. 2021, MNRAS 507, 1, 129 10.1093/mnras/stab1526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speagle, J. S., Steinhardt, C. L., Capak, P. L., & Silverman, J. D., ApJS, 214, 15 10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/15CrossRefGoogle Scholar