Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:38:50.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Neutral Islands during the Late Epoch of Reionization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2018

Yidong Xu
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory for Computational Astrophysics, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China email: [email protected]
Bin Yue
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory for Computational Astrophysics, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China email: [email protected]
Xuelei Chen
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory for Computational Astrophysics, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China email: [email protected] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China Center for High Energy Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The large-scale structure of the ionization field during the epoch of reionization (EoR) can be modeled by the excursion set theory. While the growth of ionized regions during the early stage are described by the “bubble model”, the shrinking process of neutral regions after the percolation of the ionized region calls for an “island model”. An excursion set based analytical model and a semi-numerical code (islandFAST) have been developed. The ionizing background and the bubbles inside the islands are also included in the treatment. With two kinds of absorbers of ionizing photons, i.e. the large-scale under-dense neutral islands and the small-scale over-dense clumps, the ionizing background are self-consistently evolved in the model.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2018 

References

Battaglia, N., Trac, H., Cen, R., & Loeb, A., 2013, ApJ, 776, 81Google Scholar
Bond, J. R., Cole, S., Efstathiou, G., & Kaiser, N., 1991, ApJ, 379, 440Google Scholar
Furlanetto, S. R., Zaldarriaga, M., & Hernquist, L., 2004, ApJ, 613, 1Google Scholar
Lacey, C. & Cole, S., 1993, MNRAS, 262, 627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesinger, A. & Furlanetto, S., 2007, ApJ, 669, 663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesinger, A., Furlanetto, S., & Cen, R., 2011, MNRAS, 411, 955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y., Yue, B., & Chen, X., 2017, ApJ, 844, 117Google Scholar
Xu, Y., Yue, B., Su, M., Fan, Z., & Chen, X., 2014, ApJ, 781, 97Google Scholar
Zahn, O., Lidz, A., McQuinn, M., et al. 2007, ApJ, 654, 12Google Scholar