Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:44:44.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The multipopulation phenomenon in Galactic globular clusters: M4 and M22

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

S. Villanova
Affiliation:
Departamento de Astronomía, Universidad de Concepción, Casilla 160-C, Concepción, Chile email: [email protected]
G. Piotto
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Astronomia, Università di Padova, Vicolo dell'Osservatorio 3, Padova, I-35122, Italy email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
A. F. Marino
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Astronomia, Università di Padova, Vicolo dell'Osservatorio 3, Padova, I-35122, Italy email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
A. P. Milone
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Astronomia, Università di Padova, Vicolo dell'Osservatorio 3, Padova, I-35122, Italy email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
A. Bellini
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Astronomia, Università di Padova, Vicolo dell'Osservatorio 3, Padova, I-35122, Italy email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
L. R. Bedin
Affiliation:
Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA email: [email protected]
Y. Momany
Affiliation:
Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Vicolo dell'Osservatorio 5, 35122 Padova, Italy email: [email protected], [email protected]
A. Renzini
Affiliation:
Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Vicolo dell'Osservatorio 5, 35122 Padova, Italy email: [email protected], [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present an abundance analysis based on high-resolution spectra of red-giant-branch (RGB) stars in the Galactic globular clusters NGC 6121 (M4) and NGC 6656 (M22). Our aim was to study their stellar population in the context of the multipopulation phenomenon recently discovered to affect some globular clusters. Analysis was performed for the following elements: O, Na, Mg, Al, Ca, Fe, Y, and Ba. Spectroscopic data were completed by high-precision wide-field U BV IC ground-based photometry and HST/ACS observations. For M4, we find a well-defined Na–O anticorrelation composed of two distinct groups of stars with significantly different Na and O content. The two groups of Na-rich and Na-poor stars populate two different regions along the RGB. As regards M22, Na and O follow the well-known anticorrelation found in many other GCs. However, at odds with M4, it appears to be continuous without any hint of clumpiness. On the other hand, we identified two clearly separated groups of stars with significantly different abundances of the s-process elements Y, Zr and Ba. The relative numbers of the members of both groups are very similar to the ratio of the stars in the two subgiant branches of M22 recently found by Piotto (2009). The s-element-rich stars are also richer in iron and have higher Ca abundances. This makes M22 the second cluster after ω Centauri where an intrinsic spread in Fe was found. Both spectroscopic and photometric results imply the presence of two stellar populations in M4 and M22, even if both clusters have completely different characteristics.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Bedin, L. R., Piotto, G., Anderson, J., Cassisi, S., King, I. R., Momany, Y., & Carraro, G. 2004, ApJ, 605, 125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. A. & Wallerstein, G. 1992, AJ, 104, 1818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannon, R. D., Croke, B. F. W., Bell, R. A., Hesser, J. E., & Stathakis, R. A. 1998, MNRAS, 298, 601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carretta, E., Gratton, R. G., Lucatello, S., Bragaglia, A., & Bonifacio, P. 2005, A&A, 433, 597Google Scholar
Carretta, E., et al. 2009, A&A, 505, 117Google Scholar
Cohen, J. & Meléndez, J. 2005, AJ, 129, 303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinescu, D. I., Girard, T. M., & van Altena, W. F. 1999, AJ, 117, 1792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratton, R. G. 1982, A&A, 115, 171Google Scholar
Gratton, R., Sneden, C., & Carretta, E. 2004, ARA&A, 42, 385Google Scholar
Harris, W. E. 1996, AJ, 112, 1487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y. W., Joo, J. M., Sohn, Y. J., Rey, S.-C., Lee, H.-C., & Walker, A. R. 1999, Nature, 402, 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehnert, M. D., Bell, R. A., & Cohen, J. G. 1991, ApJ, 367, 514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milone, A. P., et al. 2008, ApJ, 673, 241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. 1981, ApJ, 248, 177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. & Freeman, K. C. 1983, ApJ, 266, 130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, R. C. & Cudworth, K. M. 1994, ApJ, 420, 612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piotto, G., Bedin, L. R., Anderson, J., King, I. R., Cassisi, S., Milone, A. P., Villanova, S., Pietrinferni, A., & Renzini, A. 2007, ApJ, 661, 53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V. V., Cunha, K., Ivans, I. I., Lattanzio, J. C., Campbell, S., & Hinkle, K. H. 2005, ApJ, 633, 392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. H. & Briley, M. M. 2005, PASP, 117, 895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suntzeff, N. B. & Kraft, R. P. 1996, AJ, 111, 1913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villanova, S., et al. 2007, ApJ, 663, 296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yong, D. & Grundahl, F. 2008, ApJ, 672, 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar