Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:16:49.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multiple populations in globular clusters: New insights from chemical evolution and horizontal-branch models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Young-Wook Lee
Affiliation:
Center for Galaxy Evolution Research and Department of Astronomy, Yonsei University, Seoul03722, Korea email: [email protected]
Jenny J. Kim
Affiliation:
Center for Galaxy Evolution Research and Department of Astronomy, Yonsei University, Seoul03722, Korea email: [email protected] Astronomisches Rechen-Institut, Zentrum für Astronomie der Universität Heidelberg, Mönchhofstraße 12-14, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Sohee Jang
Affiliation:
Center for Galaxy Evolution Research and Department of Astronomy, Yonsei University, Seoul03722, Korea email: [email protected]
Chul Chung
Affiliation:
Center for Galaxy Evolution Research and Department of Astronomy, Yonsei University, Seoul03722, Korea email: [email protected]
Dongwook Lim
Affiliation:
Center for Galaxy Evolution Research and Department of Astronomy, Yonsei University, Seoul03722, Korea email: [email protected] Astronomisches Rechen-Institut, Zentrum für Astronomie der Universität Heidelberg, Mönchhofstraße 12-14, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Seungsoo Hong
Affiliation:
Center for Galaxy Evolution Research and Department of Astronomy, Yonsei University, Seoul03722, Korea email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In order to investigate the origin of multiple populations in globular clusters (GCs), we have constructed new chemical evolution models for proto-GCs where the supernova blast waves undergo blowout without expelling the ambient gas. Chemical enrichments in our models are then dictated by the winds of massive stars together with the asymptotic-giant-branch stars ejecta. We find that the observed Na-O anti-correlation can be reproduced when multiple episodes of starburst and enrichment are allowed to continue in proto-GCs. The “mass budget problem” is mostly resolved by our models without ad-hoc assumptions on star formation efficiency, initial mass function, and significant loss of first-generation stars. Interestingly, ages and chemical abundances predicted by this chemical evolution model are in good agreements with those independently obtained from our stellar evolution model for the horizontal-branch. We also discuss observational evidence for the GC-like multiple populations in the Milky Way bulge.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2020

References

Bastian, N. & Lardo, C. 2018, ARAA, 56, 83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calura, F., Few, C. G., Romano, D., & D’Ercole, A. 2015, Ap. Lett., 814, L14Google Scholar
Ferraro, F. R., Dalessandro, E., Mucciarelli, A., et al. 2009, Nature, 462, 483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratton, R. G., Carretta, E., & Bragaglia, A. 2012a, ARAA, 20, 50Google Scholar
Jang, S., Kim, J. J., Lee, Y.-W. 2019, ApJ, 886, 116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jang, S., Lee, Y.-W., Joo, S.-J., & Na, C. 2014, MNRAS, 443, L15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joo, S.-J., Lee, Y.-W., & Chung, C. 2017, ApJ, 840, 98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. J., & Lee, Y.-W. 2018, ApJ, 869, 35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y.-W., Hong, S., Lim, D., et al. 2018, Ap. Lett., 862, L8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y.-W. & Jang, S. 2016, ApJ, 833, 236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y.-W., Joo, J.-M., Sohn, Y.-J., et al. 1999, Nature, 402, 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y.-W., Joo, S.-J., Han, S.-I., et al. 2005, Ap. Lett., 621, L57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y.-W., Joo, S.-J., Han, S.-I., et al. 2015, Highlights of Astronomy, 16, 247Google Scholar
Lee, Y.-W., Kim, J. J., Johnson, C. I., et al. 2019, ApJ, 878, 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, C., Geisler, D., Villanova, S., et al. 2018, A&A, 620, A96Google Scholar
Oey, M. S., Herrera, C. N., Silich, S., et al. 2017, Ap. Lett., 849, L1Google Scholar
Renzini, A., D’Antona, F., Cassisi, S., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 4197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, J., Kruijssen, J. M. Diederik, Crain, R. A., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 4309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silich, S. & Tenorio-Tagle, G. 2017, MNRAS, 478, 5112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, B., Cohen, R. E., Geisler, D., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 465, 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenorio-Tagle, G., Muñoz-Tuñón, C., Silich, S., & Cassisi, S. 2015, ApJ, 814, 8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. L., Consiglio, S. M., Beck, S. C., et al. 2017, ApJ, 846, 73CrossRefGoogle Scholar