Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T23:48:24.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microarcsecond Astrometry with MCAO Using a Diffractive Mask

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2014

S. Mark Ammons
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Physics Division L-210 7000 East Ave., Livermore, CA 94550 email: [email protected]
Eduardo A. Bendek
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Olivier Guyon
Affiliation:
University of Arizona National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Subaru Telescope
Bruce Macintosh
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Physics Division L-210 7000 East Ave., Livermore, CA 94550 email: [email protected]
Dmitry Savransky
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Physics Division L-210 7000 East Ave., Livermore, CA 94550 email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present a new ground-based technique to detect or follow-up long-period, potentially habitable exoplanets via precise relative astrometry of host stars using Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics (MCAO) on 8 meter telescopes equipped with diffractive masks. MCAO improves relative astrometry both by cancellation of high-altitude atmospheric layers, which induce dynamic focal-plane distortions, and the improvement of centroiding precision with sharper PSFs. However, mass determination of habitable exoplanets requires multi-year reference grid stability of ~1–10 μas or nanometer-level stability on the long-term average of out-of-pupil phase errors, which is difficult to achieve with MCAO (e.g., Meyer et al. 2011). The diffractive pupil technique calibrates dynamic distortion via extended diffraction spikes generated by a dotted primary mirror, which are referenced against a grid of background stars (Guyon et al. 2012). The diffractive grid provides three benefits to relative astrometry: (1) increased dynamic range, permitting observation of V < 10 stars without saturation; (2) calibration of dynamic distortion; and (3) a spectrum of the target star, which can be used to calibrate the magnitude of differential atmospheric refraction to the microarcsecond level. A diffractive 8-meter telescope with diffraction-limited MCAO in K-band reaches < 3–5 μas relative astrometric error per coordinate perpendicular to the zenith vector in one hour on a bright target star in fields of moderate stellar density (~10–40 stars arcmin−2). We present preliminary on-sky results of a test of the diffractive mask on the Nickel telescope at Lick Observatory.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Ammons, S. M., Bendek, E., & Guyon, O. 2011, proc. SPIE, 8151, 25Google Scholar
Ammons, S. M., Bendek, E., Guyon, O., Macintosh, B., & Savransky, D. 2012, proc. SPIE, 8447, 0PGoogle Scholar
Anglada-Escudé, G., Boss, A., Weinberger, A., Thompson, I., Butler, R., Vogt, S., & Rivera, E. 2012, ApJ, 746, 37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anglada-Escudé, G., et al. 2012, ApJ, 751, 16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendek, E., Ammons, S. M., Shankar, H., & Guyon, O. 2011, proc. SPIE, 8151, 26Google Scholar
Benedict, G. F., et al. 1999, AJ, 118, 1086Google Scholar
Cameron, P. B., Britton, M., & Kulkarni, S. 2009, AJ, 137, 83Google Scholar
Dupuy, T., Liu, M., Bowler, B., Cushing, M., Helling, C., Witte, S., & Hauschildt, P. 2010, ApJ, 721, 1725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupuy, T. & Liu, M. 2012, ApJ, 201, 19Google Scholar
Fritz, T., Gillessen, S., Trippe, S., Ott, T., Bartko, H., Pfuhl, O., Dodds-Eden, K., Davies, R., Eisenhauer, F., & Genzel, R. 2010, MNRAS, 401, 1177Google Scholar
Guyon, O., Bendek, E., Ammons, S. M., Shao, M., Shaklan, S., Woodruff, J., & Belikov, R. 2011, proc. SPIE, 8151, 24Google Scholar
Guyon, O., Bendek, E., Eisner, J., Angel, R., Woolf, N., Milster, T., Ammons, S. M., Shao, M., Shaklan, S., Levine, M., Nemati, B., Pitman, J., Woodruff, J., & Belikov, R. 2012, ApJS, 200, 11Google Scholar
Haghighipour, N., Vogt, S., Butler, R., Rivera, E., Laughlin, G., Meschiari, S., & Henry, G. 2010, ApJ, 715, 271Google Scholar
Johnson, J., et al. 2012, AJ, 143, 111Google Scholar
Lu, J., Ghez, A., Yelda, S., Do, T., Clarkson, W., McCrady, N., & Morris, M. 2010, proc. SPIE, 7736, 51Google Scholar
Macintosh, B., Anthony, A., Atwood, J., et al. 2012, proc. SPIE, 8446, 1UGoogle Scholar
Majewski, S., et al. 2009, Chapter 4 of SIM Lite Book, (arXiv:0902.2759)Google Scholar
Meyer, E., Kürster, M., Arcidiacono, C., Ragazzoni, R., & Rix, H.-W. 2011, A&A, 532, 16Google Scholar
Neichel, B., et al. 2012, proc. SPIE, 8447, 4QGoogle Scholar
Pravdo, S. & Shaklan, S. 1996, ApJ, 465, 264Google Scholar
Shao, M., Marcy, G., Catanzarite, J., Edberg, S., Leger, A., Malbet, F., Queloz, D., Muterspaugh, M., Beichman, C., Fischer, D., Ford, E., Olling, R., Kulkarni, S., Unwin, S., & Traub, W. 2009, astro2010, 271 (http://arxiv.org/abs/0904.0965)Google Scholar
Shao, M., Catanzarite, J., & Pan, X. 2010, ApJ, 720, 357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sozzetti, A. 2010, EAS Publications Series, 42, 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trippe, S., Davies, R., Eisenhauer, F., Schreiber, N., Fritz, T., & Genzel, R. 2010, MNRAS, 402, 1126Google Scholar
Unwin, S., Shao, M., & Edberg, S. 2008, proc. SPIE, 7013, 78Google Scholar
Wehrle, A., et al. 2009, Chapter 11 of SIM Lite BookGoogle Scholar