Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:02:52.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Merging neutron star binaries: equation of state and electrodynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2013

Dong Lai
Dong Lai*
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Merging neutron star (NS) binaries may be detected by ground-based gravitational wave (GW) interferometers (e.g. LIGO/VIRGO) within this decade and may also generate electromagnetic radiation detectable by wide-field, fast imaging telescopes that are coming online. The GWs can provide new constraint on the NS equation of state (including mass-radius relation and the related nuclear symmetry energy). This paper reviews various hydrodynamical and electrodynamical processes in coalescing NS binaries, with focus on the pre-merger phase.

Keywords

pulsars – neutron stars – gravitational waves – binaries
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 8 , Symposium S291: Neutron Stars and Pulsars: Challenges and Opportunities after 80 years , August 2012 , pp. 149 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013

References

Aly, J. J. 1985, A&A, 143, 19Google Scholar
Aly, J. J. & Kuijpers, J. 1990, A&A, 227, 473Google Scholar
Bauswein, A., Janka, H.-T., Hebeler, K., & Schwenk, A. 2012, Phys. Rev., D86, 063001Google Scholar
Baumgarte, T. W., et al. 1998, Phys. Rev., D57, 7299Google Scholar
Berger, E. 2011, New Astronomy Review, 55, 1Google Scholar
Bildsten, L. & Cutler, C. 1992, ApJ, 400, 175Google Scholar
Binnington, T. & Poisson, E. 2009, Phys. Rev., D80, 084018Google Scholar
Cutler, C., et al. 1993, Phys. Rev. Lett., 70, 2984Google Scholar
Dall'Osso, S. & Rossi, E. M. 2012, MNRAS, in press (arXiv:1203.3440)Google Scholar
Damour, T. & Nagar, A. 2009, Phys. Rev., D80, 084035Google Scholar
Damour, T., et al. 2012, Phys. Rev., D85, 123007Google Scholar
Faber, J. A. & Rasio, F. A. 2012, Living Reviews in Relativity, 15, 8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, V., Gualtieri, L., & Maselli, A. 2012, Phys. Rev., D85, 044045Google Scholar
Flanagan, E. & Hinderer, T. 2008, Phys. Rev., D77, 021502Google Scholar
Flanagan, E. & Racine, E. 2007, Phys. Rev., D75, 044001Google Scholar
Foucart, F., et al. 2012, Phys. Rev., 85, 044015Google Scholar
Goldreich, P. & Lynden-Bell, D. 1969, ApJ, 156, 59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpern, J. P. & Gotthelf, E. V. 2010, ApJ, 709, 436Google Scholar
Hansen, B. M. S. & Lyutikov, M. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 695Google Scholar
Harding, A. K. & Lai, D. 2006, Rep. Prog. Phys., 69, 2631Google Scholar
Ho, W. C. G. & Lai, D. 1999, MNRAS, 308, 153Google Scholar
Kaplan, D. L., et al. 2011, ApJ, 736, 117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochanek, C. S. 1992, ApJ, 398, 234Google Scholar
Lai, D. 1994, MNRAS, 270, 611Google Scholar
Lai, D. 2012, ApJ, 757, L3Google Scholar
Lai, D., Rasio, F. A., & Shapiro, S. L. 1994, ApJ, 420, 811Google Scholar
Lai, D., Rasio, F. A., & Shapiro, S. L. 1994, ApJ, 437, 742Google Scholar
Lai, D. & Shapiro, S. L. 1995, ApJ, 443, 705Google Scholar
Lai, D. & Wiseman, A. G. 1996, Phys. Rev., D54, 3958Google Scholar
Lai, D. & Wu, Y. 2006, Phys. Rev., D74, 024007Google Scholar
Lovelace, R. V. E., Romanova, M. M., & Bisnovatyi-Kogan, G. S. 1995, MNRAS, 275, 244Google Scholar
Lynden-Bell, D. & Boily, C. 1994, MNRAS, 267, 146Google Scholar
Lyutikov, M. 2011, Phys. Rev. D 83, 124035Google Scholar
McWilliams, S. T. & Levin, J. 2011, ApJ, 742, 90Google Scholar
Medin, Z. & Lai, D. 2007, MNRAS, 382, 1833Google Scholar
Nissanke, S., Kasliwal, M., & Georgieva, A. 2012, arXiv:1210.6362Google Scholar
Pavlov, G. G., Shibanov, Y. A., Zavlin, V. E., & Meyer, R. D. 1995, in Lives of Neutron Stars, eds. Alpar, M. A. (Kluwer, Dordrecht)Google Scholar
Penner, A. J., Andersson, N., et al. 2011, Phys. Rev., D84, 103006Google Scholar
Potekhin, A. Y., et al. 2012, A&A, 546, 121Google Scholar
Reisenegger, A. & Goldreich, P. 1994, ApJ, 426, 688Google Scholar
Sekiguchi, Y., et al. 2012, Prog. Theo. Exp. Phys., 2012, 304Google Scholar
Shabaltas, N. & Lai, D. 2012, ApJ, 748, 148Google Scholar
Shibata, M. 1994, Prog. Theo. Phys., 91, 871Google Scholar
Shibata, M. & Taniguchi, K. 2006, Phys. Rev., D73, 064027Google Scholar
Tsang, D., et al. 2012, Phys. Rev. Lett., 108, 011102Google Scholar
Utyu, K., et al. 2009, Phys. Rev., D80, 124004Google Scholar
Uzdensky, D., Königl, A., & Litwin, C. 2002, ApJ, 565, 1191Google Scholar
van Adelsberg, M. & Lai, D. 2006, MNRAS, 373, 1495Google Scholar
Vietri, M. 1996, ApJ, 471, L95Google Scholar
Vigano, D. & Pons, J. A. 2012, MNRAS, 425, 248Google Scholar
Wiggins, P. & Lai, D. 2000, ApJ, 532, 530Google Scholar