Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:45:08.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Masses and M/L Ratios of Bright Globular Clusters in NGC 5128

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2007

M. Rejkuba
Affiliation:
ESO, Karl-Schwarzschild-Strasse 2, D-85748 Garching, Germany email: [email protected]
P. Dubath
Affiliation:
Observatoire de Geneve, ch. des Maillettes 51, 1290 Sauverny, Switzerland
D. Minniti
Affiliation:
Pontificia Univ. Católica de Chile, Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Santiago 22, Chile
G. Meylan
Affiliation:
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Observatoire, 1290 Sauverny, Switzerland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present an analysis of the radial velocities and velocity dispersions for 27 bright globular clusters in the nearby elliptical galaxy NGC 5128 (Centaurus A). For 22 clusters we combine our new velocity dispersion measurements with the information on the structural parameters, either from the literature when available or from our own data, in order to derive the cluster masses and mass-to-light (M/L) ratios. The masses range from 1.2 × 105M, typical of Galactic globular clusters, to 1.4 × 107M, similar to more massive dwarf globular transition objects (DGTOs) or ultra compact dwarfs (UCDs) and to nuclei of nucleated dE galaxies. The average M/LV is 3±1, larger than the average M/LV of globular clusters in the Local Group galaxies. The correlations of structural parameters, velocity dispersion, masses and M/LV for the bright globular clusters extend the properties established for the most massive Local Group clusters towards those characteristic of dwarf elliptical galaxy nuclei and DGTOs/UCDs. The detection of the mass-radius and the mass-M/LV relations for the globular clusters with masses greater than ~ 2 × 106M provides the link between “normal” old globular clusters, young massive clusters, and evolved massive objects.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Baumgardt, H. & Makino, J. 2003 MNRAS 340, 227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djorgovski, S. & Meylan, G. 1994, AJ 108, 1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubath, P. & Grillmair, C. J. 1997, A&A 321, 379Google Scholar
Geha, M., Guhathakurta, P. & van der Marel, R. P. 2002, AJ 124, 3073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haşegan, M., Jordán, A., Côté, P., et al. 2005, ApJ 627, 203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilker, M., Infante, L., Vieira, G., et al. 1999, A&AS, 134, 75Google Scholar
Hilker, M. 2006, in: Richtler, T. & Larsen, S. (eds.) “Globular Clusters - Guides to Galaxies”, Concepcion, Chile (Springer), astro-ph/0605447Google Scholar
Hilker, M., Baumgardt, H., Infante, L., et al. 2007, A&A 463, 119Google Scholar
King, I. R. 1966, AJ 71, 64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kissler-Patig, M., Jordán, A. & Bastian, N. 2006, A&A 448, 1031Google Scholar
Lamers, H. J. G. L. M., Gieles, M., Bastian, N., et al. 2005 A&A 441, 117Google Scholar
Larsen, S. S., Brodie, J. P, Sarajedini, A. & Huchra, J. P. 2002, AJ 124, 2615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martini, P, & Ho, L. C. 2004, ApJ 610, 233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meylan, G., Mayor, M., Duquennoy, A. & Dubath, P. 1995, A&A 303, 761Google Scholar
Meylan, G., Sarajedini, A., Jablonka, P., et al. 2001, AJ 122, 830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mieske, S., Hilker, M., Jordán, A., et al. 2007 A&A 472, 111Google Scholar
McLaughlin, D. E. 2000, ApJ 539, 618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, D. E. & van der Marel, R. P. 2005, ApJ 539, 618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rejkuba, M. 2001, A&A 369, 812Google Scholar
Rejkuba, M. 2004, A&A, 413, 903Google Scholar
Rejkuba, M., Dubath, P., Minniti, D. & Meylan, G. 2007, A&A 469, 147Google Scholar
Wehner, E. & Harris, W. E. 2007, ApJ Lett accepted, arXiv:0708.1514v1Google Scholar