Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T03:18:57.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Masing Event in the Cat’s Paw

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2018

G. MacLeod
Affiliation:
Hartebeesthoek Radio Astronomy Observatory, P.O. Box 443, Krugersdorp, RSA 1740 email: [email protected]
D. Smits
Affiliation:
Dept. of Mathematics, University of South Africa, RSA
S. Goedhart
Affiliation:
SKA SA, RSA
S. Ellingsen
Affiliation:
School of Physical Sciences, U. of Tasmania, Australia
T. Hunter
Affiliation:
NRAO, USA
C. Brogan
Affiliation:
NRAO, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present Kitty, an unprecedented and near simultaneous flaring event in ten transitions (6 hydroxyl, 1 water and 3 methanol), that began on 1 January 2015 in the massive star-forming region NGC6334F located in the Cat’s Paw Nebula. The brightest components in each transition increased by factors of 20 to 70 in line with a factor of ~70 increase in dust emission luminosity for the source MM1. We also report the detection of only the fifth known 4.660 GHz hydroxyl maser and that it varied in a correlated fashion with 1.720, 6.031, and 6.035 GHz hydroxyl counterparts. We postulate that if Kitty, and two historical flares in 1965 & 1999, are accretion events and are caused by the successive passages of a secondary star disrupting the accretion disk, where the frequency of occurrence is cycling down at a rate of ~2.2, it is possible another event will occur in 2022.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2018 

References

Bally, J. 2002, ASP Conference Series, vol. 267, p. 219Google Scholar
Caswell, J. L., Kramer, B. H., & Reynolds, J. E., 1995, MNRAS, 414, 1914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cragg, D. M., Sobolev, A. M., & Godfrey, P. D., 2002, MNRAS, 331, 521Google Scholar
Cohen, R. J., Masheder, M. R. W., & Caswell, J. L., 1995, MNRAS, 274, 808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellingsen, S. P., Norris, R. P., Diamond, P. J., McCulloch, P. M., Amy, S. W., Beasley, A. J., Ferris, R. H., Gough, R. G., King, E. A., Lovell, J. E. J., Reynolds, J. E., Tzioumis, A. K., Troup, E. R., Wark, R. M., & Wieringa, M. H. 1996, Astrophysics e-prints, astroph/9604024Google Scholar
Goedhart, S., Gaylard, M. J., & van der Walt, D. J., 2004, MNRAS, 355, 553Google Scholar
Gray, M. D. & Field, D., Doel, R. C., 1992, A&A, 262, 555Google Scholar
Hunter, T. R., Brogan, C. L., MacLeod, G., Cyganowski, C. J., Chandler, C. J., Chibueze, J. O., Friesen, R., Indebetouw, R., Thesner, C., & Young, K. H., 2017, ApJ, 837, L29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, G. C., Gaylard, M. J., & Kemball, A. J., 1993, MNRAS, 262, 343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, H., Dieter, N. H., & Williams, D. R. W., 1968, ApJS, 16, 219Google Scholar