Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:54:43.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Long-term variation of sunspot penumbra to umbra area ratio

A study using Kodaikanal white-light Digitized Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2018

Bibhuti Kumar Jha
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Banglore 560034, India email: [email protected]
Sudip Mandal
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Banglore 560034, India email: [email protected]
Dipankar Banerjee
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Banglore 560034, India email: [email protected] Center of Excellence in Space Sciences India, IISER Kolkata, Mohanpur 741246, West Bengal, India email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A typical sunspot, as seen in white-light intensity images, has a two part structure: a dark umbra and a lighter penumbra. Such distinction primarily arises due to the different orientations of magnetic fields in these two regions. In this study, we use the Kodaikanal white-light digitized data archive to analyze the long-term evolution of umbral and penumbal area. We used an ‘automated algorithm’ to uniquely identify the sunspot umbra (including the calculation of penumbra to umbra ratio) from these digitized intensity images. Our analysis reveals that the ratio increases slightly with the increase of sunspot area upto 100 μHem but eventually settles down to a constant value after that. This study, not only allows us to better understand the evolution of an individual spot and its corresponding magnetic field but this is also beneficial for solar dynamo studies which aim to reproduce such structures using a MHD theory.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2018 

References

Antalová, A., 1971, Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of Czechoslovakia, 22, 352Google Scholar
Foukal, P., Lean, J., 1990, Science, 247, 556Google Scholar
Hathaway, D. H., 2013, Solar Phys., 286, 347Google Scholar
Mandal, S., Hegde, M., Samanta, T., Hazra, G., Banerjee, D., & Ravindra, B., 2017, A&A, 601, A106Google Scholar
Nicholson, S. B., 1933, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac., 45, 51Google Scholar
Otsu, N., 1979, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 9, 62Google Scholar
Ravindra, B., Priya, T. G., Amareswari, K., Priyal, M., Nazia, A. A., & Banerjee, D., 2013, A&A, 550, A19Google Scholar
Waldmeier, M., 1939, Astronomische Mitteilungen der Eidgenössischen Sternwarte Zurich, 14, 439Google Scholar