Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T10:27:24.472Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The locations of SNe Ib/c and their comparison to those of WR stars and GRBs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2012

Giorgos Leloudas*
Affiliation:
The Oskar Klein Centre, Department of Physics, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden email: [email protected] Dark Cosmology Centre, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The locations of long GRBs and stripped supernovae are compared to those of their favored progenitors, WR stars, and their sub-classes. Compared to Leloudas et al. (2010), we have doubled the number of galaxies with suitable WR data. In the combined sample, WC stars are found, on average, in brighter locations than WN stars. The WN distribution is fully consistent with the one of SNe Ib, while it is inconsistent with those of SNe II, Ic and GRBs. The WC distribution is both consistent with SNe Ib and Ic. It is inconsistent with SNe II, and marginally consistent with GRBs. Furthermore, we present a spectroscopic study of the locations of SNe Ib/c. The average metallicity in the environments of SNe Ic is found to be a little higher than for SNe Ib, but the difference is small and not significant within our sample. Under the assumption that the SN regions were formed in an instantaneous burst of star formation, we find that a fraction of them appear older than what is allowed in order to host SNe Ib/c from single massive stars. Within this framework, these SNe must come from lower mass binaries.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2012

References

Anderson, J. P. & James, P. A. 2008, MNRAS, 390, 1527Google Scholar
Anderson, J. P. & James, P. A. 2009, MNRAS, 399, 559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. P., Covarrubias, R. A., James, P. A., Hamuy, M., & Habergham, S. M. 2010, MNRAS, 1175Google Scholar
Bibby, J. L. & Crowther, P. A. 2010, MNRAS, 405, 2737Google Scholar
Bibby, J. L. & Crowther, P. A. 2012, MNRAS, 420, 3091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boissier, S. & Prantzos, N. 2009, A&A, 503, 137Google Scholar
Bruzual, G. & Charlot, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowther, P. A. 2007, ARAA, 45, 177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fruchter, A. S., Levan, A. J., Strolger, L., et al. 2006, Nature, 441, 463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgy, C., Meynet, G., Walder, R., Folini, D., & Maeder, A. 2009, A&A, 502, 611Google Scholar
Hadfield, L. J., Crowther, P. A., Schild, H., & Schmutz, W. 2005, A&A, 439, 265Google Scholar
Hadfield, L. J. & Crowther, P. A. 2007, MNRAS, 381, 418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, P. L., Kirshner, R. P., & Pahre, M. 2008, ApJ, 687, 1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, J., Levan, A. J., Davies, M. B., & Fruchter, A. S. 2007, MNRAS, 376, 1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., et al. 1999, ApJS, 123, 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leloudas, G., Sollerman, J., Levan, A. J., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, 29Google Scholar
Leloudas, G., Gallazzi, A., Sollerman, J., et al. 2011, A&A, 530, 95Google Scholar
Meynet, G. & Maeder, A. 2003, A&A, 404, 975Google Scholar
Meynet, G. & Maeder, A. 2005, A&A, 429, 581Google Scholar
Modjaz, M., Kewley, L., Kirshner, R. P., et al. 2008, AJ, 135, 1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modjaz, M., Kewley, L., Bloom, J. S., et al. 2011, ApJL, 731, 4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettini, M. & Pagel, B. E. J. 2004, MNRAS, 348, 59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsiadlowski, P., Joss, P. C., & Hsu, J. J. L. 1992, ApJ, 391, 246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prieto, J. L., Stanek, K. Z., & Beacom, J. F. 2008, ApJ, 673, 999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smartt, S. J. 2009, ARAA, 47, 63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sollerman, J., Östlin, G., Fynbo, J. P. U., et al. 2005, New Astron., 11, 103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vink, J. S. & de Koter, A. 2005, A&A, 442, 587Google Scholar