Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:55:44.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Light element discontinuities in the globular cluster NGC 6402 (M14)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Christian I. Johnson Open the ORCID record for Christian I. Johnson [Opens in a new window]
Christian I. Johnson*
Affiliation:
Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA, USA02138 email:[email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

NGC 6402 is one of the most massive globular clusters in the Galaxy but until recently little was known about its detailed chemical composition. Interestingly, recent results have shown that NGC 6402 exhibits a paucity of intermediate composition stars that may be indicative of an early termination of star formation. As a result, NGC 6402 may be important for understanding cluster formation and the order in which various stellar populations are born.

Keywords

Globular Clusters
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 14 , Symposium S351: Star Clusters: From the Milky Way to the Early Universe , May 2019 , pp. 305 - 308
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2020

References

Brodie, J. P., & Strader, J. 2006, ARAA, 44, 193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carretta, E. 2015, ApJ, 810, 148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carretta, E., Bragaglia, A., Gratton, R. G., et al. 2009, A&A, 505, 117Google Scholar
D’Antona, F., Vesperini, E., D’Ercole, A., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 2122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da Costa, G. S. 2016, The General Assembly of Galaxy Halos: Structure, Origin and Evolution, 110Google Scholar
Di Criscienzo, M., Tailo, M., Milone, A. P., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 446, 1469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dotter, A., Milone, A. P., Conroy, C., et al. 2018, ApJL, 865, L10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gieles, M., Charbonnel, C., Krause, M. G. H., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 2461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. I., & Pilachowski, C. A. 2010, ApJ, 722, 1373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. I., Caldwell, N., Michael Rich, R., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 4311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. J., & Lee, Y.-W. 2018, ApJ, 869, 35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marino, A. F., Milone, A. P., Renzini, A., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 3815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mateo, M., Bailey, J. I., Crane, J., et al. 2012, SPIE, 84464YGoogle Scholar
Milone, A. P., Piotto, G., Renzini, A., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 3636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mucciarelli, A., Bellazzini, M., Merle, T., et al. 2015, ApJ, 801, 68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. L., Beck, S. C., Benford, D. J., et al. 2015, Nature, 519, 331CrossRefGoogle Scholar