Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:45:50.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interferometry meets the third and fourth dimensions in galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2015

Virginia Trimble*
Affiliation:
University of California Irvine, Department of Physics and Astronomy Irvine, California 92697, USA email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Radio astronomy began with one array (Jansky's) and one paraboloid of revolution (Reber's) as collecting areas and has now reached the point where a large number of facilities are arrays of paraboloids, each of which would have looked enormous to Reber in 1932. In the process, interferometry has contributed to the counting of radio sources, establishing superluminal velocities in AGN jets, mapping of sources from the bipolar cow shape on up to full grey-scale and colored images, determining spectral energy distributions requiring non-thermal emission processes, and much else. The process has not been free of competition and controversy, at least partly because it is just a little difficult to understand how earth-rotation, aperture-synthesis interferometry works. Some very important results, for instance the mapping of HI in the Milky Way to reveal spiral arms, warping, and flaring, actually came from single moderate-sized paraboloids. The entry of China into the radio astronomy community has given large (40-110 meter) paraboloids a new lease on life.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2015 

References

Alves, J.et al. Eds. 2011, Computational Star Formation, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Asade, D.et al. 2011, in Romero, et al. 2011, p. 198Google Scholar
Asade, D.et al. 2013, in Kawabe, et al. 2013, p. 243Google Scholar
Cohen, M. H.et al. 1971, ApJ 170, 207Google Scholar
Dent, W. A. 1972, Sci 175, 1105ApJ 175, L55Google Scholar
Dent, W. A. 1973, in D. J. Hegyi Ed. Sixth Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics, Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 224, 65Google Scholar
Espada, E. 2013, in Kawabe, et al. 2013, p. 69Google Scholar
Fabry, C. & Buisson, H. 1914, ApJ 40, 241Google Scholar
Funes, J. G. & Corsini, E. M. Eds. 2008, Formation and Evolution of Galaxy Disks, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Publication No. 480Google Scholar
Giovanni, G.et al. 2011, in Romero, et al. 2011, p. 150Google Scholar
Glindemann, A. 2011, Principals of Stellar Interferometry, SpringerGoogle Scholar
Gold, T. & Mitton, S. 2012, Taking the Back off the Watch, SpringerGoogle Scholar
Goss, W. M. & McGee, R. X. 2010, Under the Radar, SpringerGoogle Scholar
Gunn, A. G. 2005, in Orchiston 2005, p. 107Google Scholar
Hoskin, M. Ed. 1997, Cambridge Illustrated History of Astronomy, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Jansky, K. G. 1932, Proc. IRE 20, 1920Google Scholar
Jarrell, R. 2005, in Orchiston 2005, p. 191Google Scholar
Kaifu, N. 2013, in Kawabe, et al. 2013, p. 243Google Scholar
Kawabe, R.et al. Eds. 2013, New Trends in Radio Astronomy in the ALMA Era: 30th Anniversary of Nobeyama Radio Observatory, ASP Conf. Proc. No 476Google Scholar
Kellermann, K. 2005, in Orchiston 2005, p. 43Google Scholar
Kellermann, K. & Moran, J. M. 2001, ARA&A 39, 457Google Scholar
Kerr, F. J. & Westerhout, G. 1964, in Blaauw, A. & Schmidt, M., Eds., Galactic Structure Univ. of Chicago Press, p. 167Google Scholar
Kraus, J. D. 1986, Radio Astronomy, 2nd Edition, Cygnus-Quasar Books, Powell, OhioGoogle Scholar
Lena, P.et al. 2012, Observational Astrophysics, 3rd Ed, SpringerGoogle Scholar
Lequeux, J. 2013, Le Verrier - Magnificant and Detestable Astronomer, SpringerGoogle Scholar
Longair, M. 2006, The Cosmic Century, Cambridge Univ. PressGoogle Scholar
Marcelin, M.et al. 1983, A&A 128, 140Google Scholar
Melia, F. 2007, The Galactic Supermassive Black Hole, Princeton Univ. PressGoogle Scholar
Munns, D. P. D. 2013, A Single Sky, MIT Press, Cambridge MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
North, J. 2008, Cosmos, Univ. of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Orchiston, W. Ed. 2005, The New Astronomy, SpringerGoogle Scholar
Orchiston, W. & Slee, B. 2005, in Orchiston 2005, p. 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawsey, J. L. 1964, in Blaauw, A. & Schnidt, M. Eds. Galactic Structure, Univ. of Chicago Press, p. 219Google Scholar
Pearson, T. J.et al. 1981, Nature 290, 365Google Scholar
Reber, G. 1940, ApJ 91, 621Google Scholar
Rees, M. J. 1966, Nature 211, 468Google Scholar
Rees, M. J. 1967, MNRAS 135, 345Google Scholar
Romero, G. E.et al. Eds. 2011, Jets at All Scales (IAUS 275), Cambridge Univ. PressGoogle Scholar
Ryle, M. & Vonberg, D. D. 1946, Nature 158, 339Google Scholar
Saha, S. K. 2011, Aperture Synthesis, SpringerGoogle Scholar
Schwarzschild, M. 1982, ApJ 263, 599Google Scholar
Scoville, N.et al. 2013, in Kawabe, et al. 2013, p. 1Google Scholar
Seigar, M. S. & Treuthardt, P. 2014, Structure and Dynamics of Disk Galaxies, ASP Vol 480, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, D. B.et al. 1972, ApJ 173, L147Google Scholar
Sjouwerman, L. O.et al. Eds. 2014, The Galactic Center, IAUS 303, Cambridge Univ. PressGoogle Scholar
Strom, R. 2005, in Orchiston 2005, p. 93Google Scholar
Sullivan, W. 1984, The Early Years of Radio Astronomy, Cambridge Univ. PressGoogle Scholar
Trimble, V. 2002, in Alves, J. F. & McCaughrean, M. J. eds. The Origin of Stars and Planets: The VLT View, Springer, p. 493Google Scholar
Trimble, V. 2011, in Lasota, J-P., Ed, Astronomy at the Frontiers of Science, Springer, p. 13Google Scholar
Ueda, J.et al. 2013, in Kawabe, et al. 2013, p. 61Google Scholar
Waller, W. H. 2013, The Milky Way, Princeton Univ. PressGoogle Scholar
Whitney, A. R.et al. 1971, Science 173, 225Google Scholar
Wilson, T. L.et al. 2009, Tools of Radio Astronomy, 5th Edition, SpringerGoogle Scholar
Wilson, T. L.et al. 2013, Tools of Radio Astronomy, 6th Edition, SpringerGoogle Scholar