Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:22:42.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intense velocity-shears and magnetic fields in diffuse molecular gas: from 10 pc to 5 mpc

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2010

Edith Falgarone  and
Pierre Hily-Blant
Edith Falgarone
Affiliation:
LERMA/LRA, CNRS UMR 8112, Ecole Normale Supérieure & Observatoire de Paris, 24 rue Lhomond, 75005 Paris, France, email: [email protected]
Pierre Hily-Blant
Affiliation:
LAOG, CNRS UMR 5571, Université Joseph Fourier, BP 53, 38041 Grenoble, France email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Regions of intense velocity-shears are identified on statistical grounds in nearby diffuse molecular gas: they form conspicuous thin (~ 0.03 pc) and parsec-long structures that do not bear the signatures of shocked gas. Several straight substructures, ~ 3 mpc thick, have been detected at different position-angles within one of them. Two exhibit the largest velocity-shears ever measured far from star forming regions, up to 780 kms−1pc−1. Their position-angles are found to be also those of 10-parsec striations in the I(100μm) dust emission of the large scale environment. The B field projections, where available in these fields, are parallel both to the parsec- and to one of the milliparsec-scale shears. These findings put in relation the small-scale intermittent facet of the gas velocity field and the large scale structure of the magnetic fields.

Keywords

TurbulenceMHDISM:magnetic fieldsISM: kinematics and dynamicsISM: structureISM: evolution
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 5 , Highlights H15: Highlights of Astronomy , November 2009 , pp. 442 - 443
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Falgarone, E., Panis, J.-F., Heithausen, A., et al. 1998, A&A 331, 669Google Scholar
Falgarone, E., Pety, J. and Hily-Blant, P. 2009, A&A in press, arXiv0910.1766FGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, P. F., Heyer, M., Narayanan, G., et al. 2008, ApJ 680, 428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heiles, C. 2000, AJ 119 923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennebelle, P., Banerjee, R., Vázquez-Semadeni, E., et al. 2008, ApJ 486, L43Google Scholar
Heyer, M., Gong, H., Ostriker, E., & Brunt, C. 2008, ApJ 680, 420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hily-Blant, P. & Falgarone, E. 2007, A&A 469, 173Google Scholar
Hily-Blant, P. & Falgarone, E. 2009, A&A 500, L29Google Scholar
Hily-Blant, P., Falgarone, E., & Pety, J. 2008, A&A 481, 367Google Scholar
Li, Z.-Y. & Nakamura, F. 2004 ApJ 609, L83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, F. & Li, Z.-Y. 2008, ApJ 687, 354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, T. P. & McCall, B. J. 2006 AARA 44, 367CrossRefGoogle Scholar