Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:43:28.553Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Integrated photometric redshifts and SED fitting as tool for galaxy evolution studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2013

Ralf Kotulla*
Affiliation:
Center for Gravitation, Cosmology, and Astrophysics, Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, 1900 E. Kenwood Blvd, Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Photometric redshifts, i.e. redshifts derived by comparing an observed spectral-energy distribution (SED) to a range of empirical or theoretical SED templates, are commonly used in studies of the high-redshift Universe. Often, the next step is to use these redshifts as fixed input parameters for SED fitting to derive physical properties for each galaxy. However, this two-step approach ignores degeneracies between redshift and, e.g., stellar mass. Here I present first results using an improved approach that integrates both methods. I find that mass determinations are, on average, three times more uncertain than they seem from the common two-step approach. If not accounted for, these underestimated uncertainties can impact our ability of making meaningful comparisons between observations and simulations of galaxy evolution.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013

References

Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., Kinney, A. L., Koornneef, J., & Storchi-Bergmann, T. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682Google Scholar
De Lucia, G. & Blaizot, J. 2007, MNRAS, 375, 2Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, H., Arnouts, S., Capak, P., et al. 2010, A&A, 523, A31Google Scholar
Ilbert, O., Capak, P., Salvato, M., et al. 2009, ApJ, 690, 1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotulla, R. & Fritze, U. 2009, MNRAS, 393, L55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotulla, R., Fritze, U., Weilbacher, P., & Anders, P. 2009, MNRAS, 396, 462Google Scholar
Lilly, S., Le Fèvre, O., Renzini, A., et al. 2007, ApJS, 172, 70Google Scholar
Madau, P. 1995, ApJ, 441, 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar