Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:27:43.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Impact of Dust/Gas Ratios on Chromospheric Activity in Red Giant and Supergiant Stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 December 2019

Kenneth G. Carpenter
Affiliation:
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 667, Greenbelt, MD, 20771, USA email: [email protected]
Gioia Rau
Affiliation:
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 667, Greenbelt, MD, 20771, USA email: [email protected] Dept. of Physics, Catholic University of America, USA email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Stencel et al. (1986) analyzed IUE spectra of a modest set of cool stars and found that they continue to produce chromospheres even in the presence of high dust levels in their outer atmospheres. This reversed the previous results of Jennings (1973) and Jennings & Dyck (1972). We describe an on-going extension of these studies to a sample of stars representing a broader range in dust/gas ratios, using archival IUE and archival and new HST data on both RGB and AGB stars. Surface fluxes in emission lines will be analyzed to assess the chromospheric activity and obscuration by dust in each star, as those fluxes will follow a different pattern for reduced activity (temperature/density dependent) vs. dust obscuration (wavelength dependent). Wind characteristics will be measured by modeling of wind-reversed chromospheric emission lines.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2019 

References

Jennings, M.C. 1973, ApJ, 185, 197 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, M.C. and Dyck, H.M. ApJ, 177, 427 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, W., Stencel, R.E., & Dickenson, D. 1983, ApJ, 274, 286 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stencel, R.E., Carpenter, K.G., & Hagen, W. 1986, ApJ, 308, 859 CrossRefGoogle Scholar