Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:38:30.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Imaging the dust and the gas around Mira using ALMA and SPHERE/ZIMPOL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 December 2019

Theo Khouri
Affiliation:
Department of Space, Earth and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, Onsala Space Observatory, 439 92 Onsala, Sweden email: [email protected]
Wouter H. T. Vlemmings
Affiliation:
Department of Space, Earth and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, Onsala Space Observatory, 439 92 Onsala, Sweden email: [email protected]
Hans Olofsson
Affiliation:
Department of Space, Earth and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, Onsala Space Observatory, 439 92 Onsala, Sweden email: [email protected]
Christian Ginski
Affiliation:
Sterrewacht Leiden, P.O. Box 9513, Niels Bohrweg 2, 2300RA Leiden, The Netherlands
Elvire De Beck
Affiliation:
Department of Space, Earth and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, Onsala Space Observatory, 439 92 Onsala, Sweden email: [email protected]
Matthias Maercker
Affiliation:
Department of Space, Earth and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, Onsala Space Observatory, 439 92 Onsala, Sweden email: [email protected]
Sofia Ramstedt
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, 751 20, Uppsala, Sweden
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The mass-loss mechanism of asymptotic giant branch stars has long been thought to rely on two processes: stellar pulsations and dust formation. The details of the mass-loss mechanism have remained elusive, however, because of the overall complexity of the dust formation process in the very dynamical pulsation-enhanced atmosphere. Recently, our understanding of AGB stars and the associated mass loss has evolved significantly, thanks both to new instruments which allow sensitive and high-angular-resolution observations and the development of models for the convective AGB envelopes and the dust formation process. ALMA and SPHERE/ZIMPOL on the VLT have been very important instruments in driving this advance in the last few years by providing high-angular resolution images in the sub-mm and visible wavelengths, respectively. I will present observations obtained using these instruments at the same epoch (2.5 weeks apart) of the AGB star Mira that resolve even the stellar disk. The ALMA data reveals the distribution and dynamics of the gas around the star, while the polarised light imaged using SPHERE shows the distribution of the dust grains expected to drive the outflows. Moreover, the observations show a central source surrounded by asymmetric distributions of gas and dust, with complementary structures seen in the two components. We model the observed CO v = 1, J = 3−2 line to determine the density, temperature and velocity of gas close to the star. This model is then used to estimate the abundance of AlO. Our results show that only a very small fraction of aluminium (≲0.1%) is locked in AlO molecules. We also calculate models to fit the observed polarised light based on the gas densities we find. The low level of visible-light polarisation detected using ZIMPOL implies that, at the time of the observations, aluminium atoms are either not efficiently depleted into dust or the aluminium-oxide grains are relatively small (≲0.02μm).

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2019 

References

Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARAA, 47, 481 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bladh, S. & Höfner, S. 2012, A&A, 546, A76 Google Scholar
Decin, L., Richards, A. M. S., Waters, L. B. F. M., et al. 2017, A&A, 608, A55 Google Scholar
Edlou, S. M., Smajkiewicz, A., & Al-Jumaily, G. A. 1993, Applied Optics, 32, 5601 10.1364/AO.32.005601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gobrecht, D., Cherchneff, I., Sarangi, A., Plane, J. M. C., & Bromley, S. T. 2016, A&A, 585, A6 Google Scholar
Harman, A. K., Ninomiya, S., & Adachi, S. 1994, Journal of Applied Physics, 76, 8032 10.1063/1.357922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinkle, K. H., Lebzelter, T., & Straniero, O. 2016, ApJ, 825, 38 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höfner, S. 2008, A&A, 491, L1 Google Scholar
Höfner, S., Bladh, S., Aringer, B., & Ahuja, R. 2016, A&A, 594, A108 Google Scholar
Höfner, S. & Olofsson, H. 2018, AAR, 26, 1 Google Scholar
Ireland, M. J., Monnier, J. D., Tuthill, P. G., et al. 2007, ApJ, 662, 651 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamiński, T., Wong, K. T., Schmidt, M. R., et al. 2016, A&A, 592, A42 Google Scholar
Karovicova, I., Wittkowski, M., Ohnaka, K., et al. 2013, A&A, 560, A75 Google Scholar
Karovska, M., Schlegel, E., Hack, W., Raymond, J. C., & Wood, B. E. 2005, ApJ (Letters), 623, L137 Google Scholar
Khouri, T., Maercker, M., Waters, L. B. F. M., et al. 2016, A&A, 591, A70 Google Scholar
Khouri, T., Waters, L. B. F. M., de Koter, A., et al. 2015, A&A, 577, A114 Google Scholar
Koike, C., Kaito, C., Yamamoto, T., et al. 1995, Icarus, 114, 203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Min, M., Dullemond, C. P., Dominik, C., de Koter, A., & Hovenier, J. W. 2009, A&A, 497, 155 Google Scholar
Min, M., Hovenier, J. W., & de Koter, A. 2003, A&A, 404, 35 Google Scholar
Mohamed, S., & Podsiadlowski, P. 2012, Balt. Ast., 21, 88 Google Scholar
Norris, B. R. M., Tuthill, P. G., Ireland, M. J., et al. 2012, Nature, 484, 220 10.1038/nature10935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohnaka, K., Weigelt, G., & Hofmann, K.-H. 2017, A&A, 597, A20 Google Scholar
Suh, K.-W. 2016, Journal of Korean Astronomical Society, 49, 127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlemmings, W., Khouri, T., O’Gorman, E., et al. 2017, Nat. Ast., 1, 848 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao-Geisler, R., Quirrenbach, A., Köhler, R., Lopez, B., & Leinert, C. 2011, A&A, 530, A120 Google Scholar