Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:41:55.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How does the Sun Influence the Magnetospheres of Jupiter and Saturn?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2018

Caitríona M. Jackman Open the ORCID record for Caitríona M. Jackman [Opens in a new window]  and
Christopher S. Arridge
Caitríona M. Jackman
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK email: [email protected]
Christopher S. Arridge
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YB, UK email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Spacecraft have visited Jupiter and Saturn at all phases of the solar cycle and thus we have a wealth of data with which to explore both upstream parameters and magnetospheric response. In this paper we review upstream parameters including interplanetary magnetic field strength and direction, solar wind dynamic pressure, plasma beta and Mach number. We consider the impact of changing solar wind on dayside coupling via reconnection. We also comment on how solar UV flux variability over a solar cycle influences the plasma and neutral tori in the inner magnetospheres of Jupiter and Saturn, and thus estimate the solar cycle effects on internally driven magnetospheric dynamics. Finally we place our results in the context of the now complete set of data from the Cassini mission at Saturn and the current data streaming in from Juno at Jupiter, outlining future avenues for research.

Keywords

JupiterSaturnsolar windinterplanetary mediumUV radiationplanets and satellites: generalmolecular processes
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 13 , Symposium S335: Space Weather of the Heliosphere: Processes and Forecasts , July 2017 , pp. 109 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2018 

References

Arridge, C. S. 2015, Magnetotails of Uranus and Neptune (John Wiley & Sons, Inc), 119–133Google Scholar
Arridge, C. S., Jasinski, J. M., Achilleos, N., et al. 2016, JGR: Space Physics, 121, 3006Google Scholar
Axford, W. I. & Hines, C. O. 1961, Can. J. Phys., 39, 1433Google Scholar
Bunce, E. J., Cowley, S. W. H., Wright, D. M., et al. 2005, GRL, 32, L20S04Google Scholar
Burkholder, B., Delamere, P. A., Ma, X., et al. 2017, GRL, 44, 5877Google Scholar
Delamere, P. A. & Bagenal, F. 2013, JGR: Space Physics, 118, 7045Google Scholar
Ebert, R., Bagenal, F., McComas, D. & Fowler, C. 2014, Front. Astron. Space Sci., 1, 4Google Scholar
Ebert, R. W., Allegrini, F., Bagenal, F., et al. 2017, GRL, 44, 4401Google Scholar
Fleshman, B. L., Delamere, P. A., Bagenal, F. & Cassidy, T. 2012, JGR: Planets, 117, E05007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsyth, R. J., Balogh, A., Smith, E. J., Erdös, G. & McComas, D. J. 1996, JGR, 101, 395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuselier, S. A., Frahm, R., Lewis, W. S., et al. 2014, JGR: Space Physics, 119, 2563Google Scholar
Grocott, A., Badman, S. V., Cowley, S. W. H., et al. 2009, JGR: Space Physics, 114, a07219Google Scholar
Hanlon, P. G., Dougherty, M. K., Forsyth, R. J., et al. 2004, JGR: Space Physics, 109, A09S03Google Scholar
Hill, T. W. 2017, Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling at Jupiter and Saturn, ed. Chappell, C. R., Shunk, R., Banks, P., Burch, J. & Thorne, R.Google Scholar
Jackman, C. M., Achilleos, N., Bunce, E. J., et al. 2004, JGR: Space Physics, 109, a11203Google Scholar
Jackman, C. M. & Arridge, C. S. 2011, So. Phys., 274, 481Google Scholar
Jackman, C. M., Forsyth, R. J. & Dougherty, M. K. 2008, JGR: Space Physics, 113, a08114Google Scholar
Jasinski, J. M., Arridge, C. S., Coates, A. J., et al. 2016a, JGR: Space Physics, 121, 12Google Scholar
Jasinski, J. M., Slavin, J. A., Arridge, C. S., et al. 2016b, GRL, 43, 6713Google Scholar
Masters, A. 2015, GRL, 42, 2577Google Scholar
Masters, A., Eastwood, J. P., Swisdak, M., et al. 2012, GRL, 39, L08103Google Scholar
McAndrews, H. J., Owen, C. J., Thomsen, M. F., et al. 2008, JGR: Space Physics, 113, A04210Google Scholar
McComas, D. J., Angold, N., Elliott, H. A., et al. 2013, ApJ, 779, 2Google Scholar
Milan, S. E., Cowley, S. W. H., Lester, M., et al. 2004, JGR: Space Physics, 109, A04220Google Scholar
Nichols, J. D., Cowley, S. W. H. & McComas, D. J. 2006, Annales Geophysicae, 24, 393Google Scholar
Odstrcil, D. 2003, Adv. Sp. Res., 32, 497Google Scholar
Pilkington, N. M., Achilleos, N., Arridge, C. S., et al. 2014, JGR: Space Physics, 119, 2858Google Scholar
Scurry, L. & Russell, C. T. 1991, JGR: Space Physics, 96, 9541Google Scholar
Sonnerup, B. U. Ã. 1974, JGR, 79, 1546Google Scholar
Sulaiman, A. H., Masters, A., Dougherty, M. K. & Jia, X. 2014, JGR: Space Physics, 119, 5651Google Scholar
Tindale, E. & Chapman, S. C. 2016, GRL, 43, 5563Google Scholar
Vasyliunas, V. M. 1983, Plasma distribution and flow, ed. Dessler, A. J., 395–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zieger, B. & Hansen, K. C. 2008, JGR: Space Physics, 113, a08107Google Scholar