Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T15:08:17.104Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Halo Occupation Distribution of AGNs throught Numerical Simulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2014

Liliana Altamirano-Dévora ,
Takamitsu Miyaji  and
Héctor Aceves
Liliana Altamirano-Dévora
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astronomía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ensenada, Baja California, México email: [email protected]
Takamitsu Miyaji
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astronomía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ensenada, Baja California, México email: [email protected] Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California, San Diego, USA
Héctor Aceves
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astronomía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ensenada, Baja California, México email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Using a set of simulations in the ΛCDM cosmology, and the mass of intermediate X-Ray Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) dark matter halos (DMH), we study the Halo Occupation Distribution (HOD) of their host DMH and compare with recent observations. We assume that intermediate X-Ray AGNs have been triggered by a major merger of sub-halos inside larger host halos. We find that the binary major merger HOD slope (α ≈ 0.8) do not seem to reproduce the observed HOD slope (α < 0.6) for these type of AGNs. Other mechanisms may be igniting these AGNs.

Keywords

NumericalSimulationsAGNsCosmology
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 9 , Symposium S304: Multiwavelength AGN Surveys and Studies , October 2013 , pp. 335 - 336
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Allevato, V., Finoguenov, A., Hasinger, G., Miyaji, T., Cappelluti, N., et al. 2012, ApJ 758, 47Google Scholar
Bournaud, F., Dekel, A., Teyssier, R., et al. 2011, ApJL, 741, L33Google Scholar
Cisternas, M., Jahnke, K., Inskip, K. J., et al. 2011, ApJ, 726, 57Google Scholar
Grogin, N. A., Conselice, C. J., Chatzichristou, E., et al. 2005, ApJL, 627, L97Google Scholar
Knollmann, S. R. & Knebe, A. 2009, ApJS, 182, 608Google Scholar
Larson, D., Dunkley, J., Hinshaw, G., et al. 2011, ApJS, 192, 16Google Scholar
Miyaji, T., Krumpe, M., Coil, A. L., & Aceves, H. 2011, ApJ, 726, 83Google Scholar
Springel, V. 2005, MNRAS, 364, 1105Google Scholar