Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:10:32.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

GRB Prompt X-ray Emission

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2012

Takanori Sakamoto*
Affiliation:
Center for Research and Exploration in Space Science and Technology (CRESST), NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, U.S.A. Joint Center for Astrophysics, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250, U.S.A. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, U.S.A. email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

I present the observational properties of the prompt emission of supernova associated GRBs (SN-GRBs) focusing on temporal and spectral characteristics. I compare the properties of SN-GRBs with typical long GRBs to see whether there is a distinct difference or not. Furthermore, I present our attempt to search for hard X-ray emission prior to the discovery date from optically identified type Ibc supernovae using Swift BAT survey data.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2012

References

Amati, L., et al. 2002, A&A, 390, 81Google Scholar
Amati, L., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 233Google Scholar
Arimoto, M., et al. 2010, PASJ, 62, 487Google Scholar
Band, D. L., et al. 1993, ApJ, 413, 281Google Scholar
Barthelmy, S. D., et al. 2005, Space Sci. Revs, 121, 143Google Scholar
Burrows, D. N., et al. 2005, Space Sci. Revs, 121, 165Google Scholar
Campana, S., et al. 2006, Nature, 442, 1008Google Scholar
Chornock, R., et al. 2011, ApJ submitted (astro-ph/arXiv:1004.2262)Google Scholar
Galama, T. J., et al. 1998, Nature, 434, 1104Google Scholar
Gehrels, N., et al. 2004, ApJ, 611, 1005Google Scholar
Hjorth, J., et al. 2003, Nature, 423, 847Google Scholar
Kaneko, Y., et al. 2007, ApJ, 654, 385Google Scholar
Liang, E.-W., et al. 2006, ApJ, 653, L81Google Scholar
Nava, L., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 1256Google Scholar
Norris, J. P., et al. 2000, ApJ, 534, 248Google Scholar
Norris, J. P. & Bonnell, J. T. 2006, ApJ, 643, 266Google Scholar
Pélangeon, A., et al. 2008, A&A, 491, 157Google Scholar
Pian, E., et al. 2006, Nature, 442, 1011Google Scholar
Ricker, G. R., et al. 2003, AIP-CP, 662, 3Google Scholar
Sakamoto, T. et al. 2005, ApJ, 629, 311Google Scholar
Sakamoto, T., et al. 2011, ApJS, 195, 1Google Scholar
Sazonov, S. Y., Lutovinov, A. A., & Sunyaev, R. A. 2004, Nature, 430, 646Google Scholar
Soderberg, A. M., et al. 2006, ApJ, 638, 930Google Scholar
Starling, R. L. C., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 411, 2792Google Scholar
Stanek, K. Z., et al. 2003, ApJ, 591, L17Google Scholar
Ukwatta, T. N., et al. 2010, ApJ, 711, 1073Google Scholar
Winkler, C., et al. 2003, A&A, 411, 1Google Scholar
Yonetoku, D., et al. 2004, ApJ, 609, 935Google Scholar