Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:48:59.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

GRB 101225A - a new class of GRBs?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2012

C. C. Thöne ,
A. de Ugarte Postigo ,
C. Fryer ,
K. Page ,
J. Gorosabel ,
D. Perley ,
M. Aloy  and
C. Kouveliotou
C. C. Thöne
Affiliation:
IAA - CSIC, Glorieta de la Astronomía s/n, E - 18008, Granada, Spain email: [email protected]
A. de Ugarte Postigo
Affiliation:
IAA - CSIC, Glorieta de la Astronomía s/n, E - 18008, Granada, Spain email: [email protected] Dark Cosmology Centre, Juliane Maries Vej 30, DK - 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
C. Fryer
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, MS D409, CCS-2, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
K. Page
Affiliation:
Dep. of Physics and Astronomy, Univ. of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
J. Gorosabel
Affiliation:
IAA - CSIC, Glorieta de la Astronomía s/n, E - 18008, Granada, Spain email: [email protected]
D. Perley
Affiliation:
Astronomy Department, UC Berkeley, 601 Campbell Hall, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
M. Aloy
Affiliation:
Departamento de Astronomia y Astrofisica, Universidad de Valencia, 46100 Burjassot, Spain
C. Kouveliotou
Affiliation:
Science and Technology Office, ZP12, NASA/MSFC, Huntsville, Alabama 35812, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Christmas burst, GRB 101225A, was one of the most controversial bursts in the last few years. Its exceptionally long duration but bright X-ray emission showing a thermal component followed by a strange afterglow with a thermal SED lead to two different interpretations. We present here our model ascribing this strange event to a new type of GRB progenitor consisting of a neutron star and an evolved main-sequence star in a very faint galaxy at redshift 0.33 while Campana et al. (2011) proposed a Galactic origin. New observations at several wavelengths might resolve the question between the two models in the near future.

Keywords

gamma rays: burstssupernovae: individual
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 7 , Symposium S279: Death of Massive Stars: Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts , April 2011 , pp. 91 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2012

References

Campana, S. et al. , 2011, Nature, 480, 69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouveliotou, C. et al. 1993, ApJ, 413, L101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woosley, S. E. & Bloom, J. S. 2006, ARAA, 44, 507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levesque, E. M., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 401, 963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fynbo, J. P. U. et al. 2006, Nature, 444, 1047Google Scholar
Racusin, J. L. et al. 2010, GCN Circ. 11493Google Scholar
Thöne, C. C. et al. 2011, Nature, 470, 72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, D., Ilyin, I., & Fynbo, J., 2010, GCN Circ., 11495Google Scholar
Galama, T. J. et al. 1998, Nature, 395, 670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J. C. et al. 2011, ApJ, 732, 76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryer, C. L. & Woosley, S. E. 1998, ApJ, 502, L9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campana, S. et al. 2006, Nature, 442, 1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, K. L. et al. 2011, MNRAS, 416, 2078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cano, Z. et al. 2011, MNRAS, 413, 669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soderberg, A. et al. 2008, Nature, 453, 469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoversten, E. A. et al. 2011, GCN Circ. 12641Google Scholar