Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T02:01:14.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

GJ 436c? The contribution of transit timings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2008

B.-O. Demory ,
M. Gillon ,
C. Waelkens ,
D. Queloz  and
S. Udry
B.-O. Demory
Affiliation:
Observatoire de l'Université de Genève, Switzerland email: [email protected]
M. Gillon
Affiliation:
Observatoire de l'Université de Genève, Switzerland email: [email protected]
C. Waelkens
Affiliation:
Instituut voor Sterrenkunde, KU Leuven, Belgium
D. Queloz
Affiliation:
Observatoire de l'Université de Genève, Switzerland email: [email protected]
S. Udry
Affiliation:
Observatoire de l'Université de Genève, Switzerland email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

From recent high-accuracy transit timings measurements, we discard the 5 M⊕ planet recently proposed by Ribas et al. (2008). Thanks to a combined radial-velocity and transit timings overview we also define a mass/period domain in which a secondary planet may be found in the system. We also show that timings obtained until now, although not sufficient to remove degeneracies on mass and period, can still restrict the parameter space of the potential secondary planet.

Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 4 , Symposium S253: Transiting Planets , May 2008 , pp. 424 - 427
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2009

References

Adams, E. R., Seager, S., Elkins-Tanton, L. 2008, ApJ, 673, 1160Google Scholar
Alonso, R., Barbieri, M., Rabus, M., Deeg, H. J., Belmonte, J. A., Almenara, J. M. 2008, ArXiv preprintsGoogle Scholar
Butler, R. P., Vogt, S. S., Marcy, G. W., Fischer, D. A., Wright, J. T., Henry, G. W., Laughlin, G., Lissauer, J. J. 2004, ApJ, 617, 580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J. E. 1999, MNRAS, 304, 793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demory, B.-O., et al. 2007, A&A, 475, 1125Google Scholar
Deming, D., Harrington, J., Laughlin, G., Seager, S., Navarro, S. B., Bowman, W. C., Horning, K. 2007, ApJ, 667, L199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S., Barnes, J. W. 2007, ApJ, 659, 1661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillon, M., Pont, F., Demory, B.-O. et al. 2007, A&A, 472, L13Google Scholar
Gillon, M., Demory, B.-O., Barman, T, et al. 2007, A&A, 471, L51Google Scholar
Holman, M. J., Murray, N. W. 2005, Science, 307, 1288Google Scholar
Laughlin, G., Chambers, J. E. 2001, ApJ, 551, L109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maness, H. L., Marcy, G. W., Ford, E. B., Hauschildt, P. H., Shreve, A. T., Basri, G. B., Butler, R. P., Vogt, S. S. 2007, PASP, 119, 90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribas, I., Font-Ribera, A., Beaulieu, J.-P. 2008, ApJ, 677, L59Google Scholar