Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:27:43.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gas Flows in Galaxies: the Relative Importance of Mergers and Bars.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Sara L. Ellison ,
David R. Patton ,
Preethi Nair ,
Luc Simard ,
J. Trevor Mendel ,
Alan W. McConnachie  and
Jillian M. Scudder
Sara L. Ellison
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, V8P 1A1, Canada
David R. Patton
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Astronomy, Trent University, 1600 West Bank Drive, Peterborough, Ontario, K9J 7B8, Canada
Preethi Nair
Affiliation:
INAF-Astronomical Observatory of Bologna, Via Ranzani 1, 40127 Bologna, Italy.
Luc Simard
Affiliation:
National Research Council of Canada, Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics, 5071 West Saanich Road, Victoria, British Columbia, V9E 2E7, Canada
J. Trevor Mendel
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, V8P 1A1, Canada
Alan W. McConnachie
Affiliation:
National Research Council of Canada, Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics, 5071 West Saanich Road, Victoria, British Columbia, V9E 2E7, Canada
Jillian M. Scudder
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, V8P 1A1, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Galaxy-galaxy interactions and large scale galaxy bars are usually considered as the two main mechanisms for driving gas to the centres of galaxies. By using large samples of galaxy pairs and visually classified bars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), we compare the relative efficiency of gas inflows from these two processes. We use two indicators of gas inflow: star formation rate (SFR) and gas phase metallicity, which are both measured relative to control samples. Whereas the metallicity of galaxy pairs is suppressed relative to its control sample of isolated galaxies, galaxies with bars are metal-rich for their stellar mass by 0.06 dex over all stellar masses. The SFRs of both the close galaxy pairs and the barred galaxies are enhanced by ~60%, but in the bars the enhancement is only seen at stellar masses M∗ > 1010 M⊙. Taking into account the relative frequency of bars and pairs, we estimate that at least three times more central star formation is triggered by bars than by interactions.

Keywords

galaxies: abundancesgalaxies: interactions
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 6 , Symposium S277: Tracing the Ancestry of Galaxies (on the land of our ancestors) , December 2010 , pp. 178 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Barton, E. J., Geller, M. J., & Kenyon, S. J., 2000, ApJ, 530, 660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Combes, F. & Elmegreen, B. G., 1993, A&A, 271, 391Google Scholar
Ellison, S. L., Patton, D. R., Simard, L., & McConnachie, A. W., 2008a, AJ, 135, 1877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, S. L., Patton, D. R., Simard, L., & McConnachie, A. W., 2008b, ApJ, 672, L107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, S. L., Patton, D. R., Simard, L., McConnachie, A. W., Baldry, I. K., & Mendel, J. T., 2010, MNRAS 407, 1514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, S. L., Nair, P., Patton, D. R., Simard, L., Scudder, J. & Mendel, J. T., 2011, MNRAS, submittedGoogle Scholar
Kewley, L. J., Geller, M. J., & Barton, E. J., 2006, AJ, 131, 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lara-Lopez, M. A., Cepa, J., Bongiovanni, A., PerezAAAAGarcia, A. M., Ederoclite, A., Castaneda, H., FernandezAAAALorenzo, M., Povic, M., & Sanchez-Portal, M., 2010, A&A, 521, L53Google Scholar
Mannucci, F., Cresci, G., Maiolino, R., Marconi, A., & Gnerucci, A., 2010, MNRAS, 408, 2115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinet, L. & Friedli, D., 1997, A&A, 323, 363Google Scholar
Montuori, M., DiAAAAMatteo, P., Lehnert, M. D., Combes, F. & Semelin, B., 2010, A&A, 518, 56Google Scholar
Nair, P. B. & Abraham, R. G., 2010a, ApJS, 186, 427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nair, P. B. & Abraham, R. G., 2010b, ApJ, 714, L260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikolic, B., Cullen, H., & Alexander, P., 2004, MNRAS, 355, 874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, D. R., Ellison, S. L., Simard, L., McConnachie, A. W. & Mendel, J. T., 2011, MNRAS, in pressGoogle Scholar