Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:53:05.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From nuclear clusters to halo globulars: Star clusters as basic galactic building blocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2006

Richard de Grijs
Richard de Grijs*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Astronomy, The University of Sheffield, Hicks Building, Hounsfield Road, Sheffield S3 7RH, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

I assess the similarities and differences between the star-formation modes in quiescent spiral galaxies versus those in violent starburst regions, including galactic nuclei. As opposed to the quiescent star-formation mode, current empirical evidence on the star-formation processes in the extreme, high-pressure environments induced by galaxy encounters strongly suggests that star cluster formation is an important and perhaps even the dominant mode of star formation in such starburst events. This implies that by using star clusters as unique diagnostic probes, we can trace a galaxy's most violent star formation history very well, at least for the past few Gyr. The sizes, luminosities, and mass estimates of the young massive star clusters are entirely consistent with what is expected for young Milky Way-type globular clusters (GCs). Recent evidence lends support to the scenario that GCs, which were once thought to be the oldest building blocks of galaxies, are still forming today.

Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 2 , Symposium S235: Galaxy Evolution Across the Hubble Time , August 2006 , pp. 48 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2007

References

Bastian, N., Gieles, M., Lamers, H.J.G.L.M., Scheepmaker, R., & de Grijs, R., 2005, A&A, 431, 905Google Scholar
Bastian, N., Saglia, R.P., Goudfrooij, P., Kissler-Patig, M., Maraston, C., Schweizer, F., & Zoccali, M., 2006, A&A, 448, 881Google Scholar
Bastian, N., & Goodwin, S.P., 2006, MNRAS, 369, L9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Grijs, R., Bastian, N., & Lamers, H.J.G.L.M., 2003a, ApJ, 583, L17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Grijs, R., Bastian, N., & Lamers, H.J.G.L.M., 2003b, MNRAS, 340, 197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Grijs, R., Anders, P., Lynds, R., Bastian, N., Lamers, H.J.G.L.M., & O'Neill, E.J. Jr., 2003, MNRAS, 343, 1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Grijs, R., Parmentier, G., & Lamers, H.J.G.L.M., 2005, MNRAS, 364, 1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Grijs, R., & Anders, P., 2006, MNRAS, 366, 295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elson, R.A.W., & Fall, S.M., 1985, PASP, 97, 692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleck, J.J., Boily, C.M.; Lançon, A., & Deiters, S., 2006, MNRAS, 369, 1392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gnedin, O.Y., & Ostriker, J.P., 1997, ApJ, 474, 223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, S.P., 1997, MNRAS, 286, 669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goudfrooij, P., Gilmore, D., Whitmore, B.C., & Schweizer, F., 2004, ApJ, 613, L121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamers, H.J.G.L.M., Anders, P., & de Grijs, R., 2006, A&A, 452, 131Google Scholar
Ma, J., de Grijs, R., Yang, Y., Zhou, X., Chen, J., Jiang, Z., Wu, Z., & Wu, J., 2006, MNRAS, 368, 1443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mengel, S., Lehnert, M.D., Thatte, N., & Genzel, R., 2002, A&A, 383, 137Google Scholar
Moll, S.L., de Grijs, R., Mengel, S., & Smith, L.J., 2006, in: “Mass loss from stars and the evolution of stellar clusters”, de Koter, A., Smith, L.J., Waters, R., eds., (San Francisco: ASP), in pressGoogle Scholar
Parmentier, G., & Gilmore, G.F., 2006, MNRAS, submittedGoogle Scholar
Smith, L.J., & Gallagher, J.S., 2001, MNRAS, 326, 1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walcher, C.-J., Böker, T., Charlot, S., Ho, L.C., Rix, H.-W., Rossa, J., Shields, J.C., & van der Marel, R.P., 2006, ApJ, in press (astro-ph/0604138)Google Scholar