Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T14:52:51.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The First 3D Simulations of Carbon Burning in a Massive Star

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2017

A. Cristini Open the ORCID record for A. Cristini [Opens in a new window] ,
C. Meakin ,
R. Hirschi ,
D. Arnett ,
C. Georgy Open the ORCID record for C. Georgy [Opens in a new window]  and
M. Viallet
A. Cristini*
Affiliation:
Astrophysics Group, Keele University, Lennard-Jones Laboratories, Keele, ST5 5BG, UK
C. Meakin
Affiliation:
Karagozian & Case, Inc., 700 N. Brand Blvd. Suite 700, Glendale, CA, 91203, USA Department of Astronomy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
R. Hirschi
Affiliation:
Astrophysics Group, Keele University, Lennard-Jones Laboratories, Keele, ST5 5BG, UK Kavli IPMU (WPI), The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8583, Japan
D. Arnett
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
C. Georgy
Affiliation:
Astrophysics Group, Keele University, Lennard-Jones Laboratories, Keele, ST5 5BG, UK Geneva Observatory, University of Geneva, Maillettes 51, 1290 Versoix, Switzerland
M. Viallet
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Astrophysik, Karl Schwarzschild Strasse 1, Garching, D-85741, Germany
*
†Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present the first detailed three-dimensional hydrodynamic implicit large eddy simulations of turbulent convection for carbon burning. The simulations start with an initial radial profile mapped from a carbon burning shell within a 15 M⊙ stellar evolution model. We considered 4 resolutions from 1283 to 10243 zones. These simulations confirm that convective boundary mixing (CBM) occurs via turbulent entrainment as in the case of oxygen burning. The expansion of the boundary into the surrounding stable region and the entrainment rate are smaller at the bottom boundary because it is stiffer than the upper boundary. The results of this and similar studies call for improved CBM prescriptions in 1D stellar evolution models.

Keywords

Convectionhydrodynamicsturbulencemethods: numericalstars: interiors
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 12 , Symposium S329: The Lives and Death-Throes of Massive Stars , November 2016 , pp. 237 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2017 

References

Arnett, W. D. and Meakin, C.. 2011 a. “Toward Realistic Progenitors of Core-collapse Supernovae.” ApJ 733:78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnett, W. D. and Meakin, C.. 2011 b. “Turbulent Cells in Stars: Fluctuations in Kinetic Energy and Luminosity.” ApJ 741:33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnett, W. D., Meakin, C., Viallet, M., Campbell, S. W., Lattanzio, J. C. and Mocák, M.. 2015. “Beyond Mixing-length Theory: A Step Toward 321D.” ApJ 809:30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colella, P. and Woodward, P. R.. 1984. “The Piecewise Parabolic Method (PPM) for Gas-Dynamical Simulations.” J. Comput. Phys. 54:174–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cristini, A., Meakin, C., Hirschi, R., Arnett, D., Georgy, C. and Viallet, M.. 2016 a. “3D Hydrodynamic Simulations of Carbon Burning in Massive Stars.” ArXiv e-prints.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cristini, A., Meakin, C., Hirschi, R., Arnett, D., Georgy, C. and Viallet, M.. 2016 b. “Linking 1D evolutionary to 3D hydrodynamical simulations of massive stars.” Phys. Scr. 91 (3):034006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggenberger, P., Meynet, G., Maeder, A., Hirschi, R., Charbonnel, C., Talon, S. and Ekström, S.. 2008. “The Geneva stellar evolution code.” Ap&SS 316:43–54.Google Scholar
Fedorovich, E., Conzemius, R. and Mironov, D.. 2004. “Convective Entrainment into a Shear-Free, Linearly Stratified Atmosphere: Bulk Models Reevaluated through Large Eddy Simulations.” J. Atmos. Sci. 61:281.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, J. and Mellado, J.. 2014. “The two-layer structure of the entrinament zone in the convective boundary layer.” J. Atmos. Sci. pp. 1935–1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gastine, T., Wicht, J. and Aurnou, J. M.. 2015. “Turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection in spherical shells.” J. Fluid Mech. 778:721–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y. and Ecke, R. E.. 2011. “Local temperature measurements in turbulent rotating Rayleigh-Bénard convection.” Phys. Rev. E 84 (1):016311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meakin, C. A. and Arnett, D.. 2007. “Turbulent Convection in Stellar Interiors. I. Hydrodynamic Simulation.” ApJ 667:448–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, P. P., Moeng, C.-H., Stevens, B., Lenschow, D. H. and Mayor, S. D.. 1998. “Structure of the Entrainment Zone Capping the Convective Atmospheric Boundary Layer.” J. Atmos. Sci. 55:3042–3064.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, P. P. and Patton, E. G.. 2011. “The Effect of Mesh Resolution on Convective Boundary Layer Statistics and Structures Generated by Large-Eddy Simulation.” J. Atmos. Sci. 68:2395–2415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmes, F. X. and Arnett, D.. 1999. “The Accuracy, Consistency, and Speed of Five Equations of State for Stellar Hydrodynamics.” ApJS 125:277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Reeuwijk, M., Hunt, G. R. and Jonker, H. J.. 2011. Direct simulation of turbulent entrainment due to a plume impinging on a density interface. In Journal of Physics Conference Series. Vol. 318 of Journal of Physics Conference Series p. 042061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viallet, M., Meakin, C., Arnett, D. and Mocák, M.. 2013. “Turbulent Convection in Stellar Interiors. III. Mean-field Analysis and Stratification Effects.” ApJ 769:1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar