Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-vmclg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-20T12:10:22.052Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feedback in the Dark Domain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2010

Keiichi Wada
Keiichi Wada*
Affiliation:
National Astronomical Observatory of Japan Email: [email protected] Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima 890-0065, Japan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In order to clarify the physics of AGN feedback and feeding, we need to understand the interstellar medium (ISM) in the central several tens of parsecs in galaxies where our observational and theoretical knowledge is relatively poor. Here we discuss feedback processes due to strong far UV and X-ray radiation, as well as the dynamical effect of a supermassive black hole (SMBH) based on new high-resolution numerical simulations of the ISM in the central R ≤ 32 pc region around a SMBH at the center of a galaxy.

Keywords

methods: numericalgalaxies: evolutiongalaxies: ISM
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 5 , Symposium S267: Co-Evolution of Central Black Holes and Galaxies , August 2009 , pp. 362 - 369
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Ballantyne, D. R. 2008, ApJ, 685, 787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, E. K. S., Davies, R. I., Malkan, M. A., Genzel, R., Tacconi, L. J., Sánchez, F. M., & Sternberg, A. 2009, ApJ, 696, 448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawakatu, N. & Wada, K. 2008, ApJ, 681, 73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawakatu, N. & Wada, K. 2009, ApJ, 706, 676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohno, K., Ishizuki, S., Matsushita, S., Vila-Vilaró, B., & Kawabe, R. 2003, PASJ, 55, L1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levenson, N. A., Sirocky, M. M., Hao, L., Spoon, H. W. W., Marshall, J. A., Elitzur, M., & Houck, J. R. 2007, ApJ, 654, L45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maloney, P. R., Hollenbach, D. J., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 1996, ApJ, 466, 561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meijerink, R. & Spaans, M. 2005, A&A, 436, 397Google Scholar
Meijerink, R., Spaans, M., & Israel, F. P. 2007, A&A, 461, 793Google Scholar
Ohsuga, K., Mineshige, S., Mori, M., & Kato, Y. 2009, PASJ, 61, L7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schartmann, M., Meisenheimer, K., Klahr, H., Camenzind, M., Wolf, S., & Henning, T. 2009, MNRAS, 393, 759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schartmann, M., Meisenheimer, K., Camenzind, M., Wolf, S., Tristram, K. R. W., & Henning, T. 2008, A&A, 482, 67Google Scholar
Shi, Y., et al. 2006, ApJ, 653, 127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spaans, M. & Meijerink, R. 2008, ApJ, 678, L5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wada, K. & Norman, C. A. 2001, ApJ, 547, 172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wada, K. & Norman, C. A. 2002, ApJ, 566, L21 (WN02)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wada, K., Meurer, G., & Norman, C. A. 2002, ApJ, 577, 197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wada, K., Papadopoulos, P., & Spaans, M. 2009, ApJ, 702, 63CrossRefGoogle Scholar