Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:59:44.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evolution of the distribution of stellar mass and light since redshift of unity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2013

Cheng Li*
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute Partner Group at Shanghai Astronomical Observatory Nandan Road 80, Shanghai 200030, China email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We use data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and the DEEP2 survey to characterize the distribution of stellar mass and light of galaxies in the low-redshift and z = 1 Universe. We investigate the clustering bias of stellar mass and light by comparing these to projected autocorrelations of dark matter estimated from the Millennium Simulations (MS). All of the autocorrelation and bias functions show systematic trends with spatial scale and waveband, which are impressively similar at the two redshifts. This shows that the well-established environmental dependence of stellar populations in the local Universe is already in place at z = 1. The recent MS-based galaxy formation simulation of Guo et al. (2011) reproduces the scale-dependent clustering of luminosity to an accuracy better than 30% in all bands and at both redshifts, but substantially overpredicts mass autocorrelations at separations below ~ 2 Mpc. Further comparison of the shapes of our stellar mass bias functions with those predicted by the model suggests that both the SDSS and DEEP2 data prefer a fluctuation amplitude of σ8 ~ 0.8 rather than the σ8 = 0.9 assumed by the MS.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013 

References

Davis, M., Faber, S. M., Newman, J., et al. 2003, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Guhathakurta, P., ed., Vol. 4834, pp. 161–172Google Scholar
Guo, Q., White, S., Boylan-Kolchin, , et al. 2011, MNRAS, 413, 101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komatsu, E., Smith, K. M., Dunkley, J., et al. 2011, ApJS, 192, 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C. & White, S. 2009, MNRAS, 398, 2177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C. & White, S. 2010, MNRAS, 407, 515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C., White, S., Chen, Y. M., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 419, 1557Google Scholar
York, D. G., Adelman, J., Anderson, J. E. Jr., et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 1579Google Scholar