Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:10:10.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Euclid space mission: a cosmological challenge for the next 15 years

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2015

R. Scaramella ,
Y. Mellier ,
J. Amiaux ,
C. Burigana ,
C.S. Carvalho ,
J.C. Cuillandre ,
A. da Silva ,
J. Dinis ,
A. Derosa  and
E. Maiorano
...Show all authors
R. Scaramella
Affiliation:
Osservatorio di Roma email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Euclid is the next ESA mission devoted to cosmology. It aims at observing most of the extragalactic sky, studying both gravitational lensing and clustering over ~15,000 square degrees. The mission is expected to be launched in year 2020 and to last six years. The sheer amount of data of different kinds, the variety of (un)known systematic effects and the complexity of measures require efforts both in sophisticated simulations and techniques of data analysis. We review the mission main characteristics, some aspects of the the survey and highlight some of the areas of interest to this meeting.

Keywords

cosmology: cosmological parametersgravitational lensingdark matterlarge-scale structure of universe
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 10 , Symposium S306: Statistical Challenges in 21st Century Cosmology , May 2014 , pp. 375 - 378
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2015 

References

Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Bacon, D., et al. 2013, Living Reviews in Relativity, 16, 6Google Scholar
Amiaux, J., Scaramella, R., Mellier, Y., et al. 2012, Proceeding of the SPIE, 8442Google Scholar
Cropper, M., Cole, R., James, A., et al. 2012, Proceeding of the SPIE, 8442Google Scholar
Cropper, M., Hoekstra, H., Kitching, T. D., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 431, 3103Google Scholar
Gorski, K. M., Wandelt, B., Hivon, E., et al.http://healpix.sourceforge.netGoogle Scholar
Laureijs, R., et al. 2011, Euclid Definition Study report, ESA/SRE(2011)1, arXiv:1110.3193Google Scholar
Massey, R., Hoekstra, H., Kitiching, T. D., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 661Google Scholar
Massey, R., Schrabback, T., Cordes, O., et al. 2014, arXiv e-print, arXiv:1401.1151v1Google Scholar
Prieto, E., Amiaux, J., Augueres, J.-L., et al. 2012, Proceeding of the SPIE, 8442Google Scholar
Semboloni, E., Hoekstra, H., Huang, Z., et al. 2013, MNRAS 432, 2385Google Scholar
Tereno, I., Carvalho, C. S., Dinis, J., et al. 2014, This volumeGoogle Scholar
Viola, M., Joachimi, B., & Kitching, T. D. 2014, MNRAS, 439, 1909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoubian, J., Kmmel, M., Kermiche, S., et al. 2014, ASP conference series, 485, 509Google Scholar