Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T03:26:14.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of turbulence on magnetic reconnection: 3D numerical simulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2008

Katarzyna Otmianowska-Mazur
Affiliation:
Astronomical Observatory, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland
G. Kowal
Affiliation:
Astronomical Observatory, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland Department of Astronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA
A. Lazarian
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA
E. Vishniac
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Turbulent reconnection is studied by means of three dimensional (3D) compressible magnetohydrodynamical numerical calculations. The process of homogeneous turbulence is set up by adding three-dimensional solenoidal random forcing implemented in the spectral space at small wave numbers with no correlation between velocity and forcing. We apply the initial Harris current sheet configuration together with a density profile calculated from the numerical equilibrium of magnetic and gas pressures. We assume that there is no external driving of the reconnection. The reconnection develops as a result of the initial vector potential perturbation. We use open boundary conditions. Our main goal is to find the dependencies of reconnection rate on different properties of turbulence. The results of our simulations show that turbulence significantly affects the topology of magnetic field near the diffusion region. We present that the reconnection speed does not depend on the Reynolds numbers as well the magnetic diffusion. In addition, a fragmentation of current sheet decreases the disparity in inflow/outflow ratios. When we apply the large scale and more powerful turbulence the reconnection is faster.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2009

References

Biskamp, D., 1996, Ap&SS 242, 165Google Scholar
Kowal, G, Lazarian, A., Vishniac, E. T., & Otmianowska-Mazur, K., 2008, Rev. Mex. de Astron. y Astrof., in pressGoogle Scholar
Lazarian, A. & Vishnniac, E. 1999, ApJ 517, 700Google Scholar
Lazarian, A. & Vishnniac, E. 2000, Rev. Mex. de Astron. y Astrof. 9, 55Google Scholar
Parker, E. N., 1957, J. Geophys. Res. 62, 509Google Scholar
Petschek, H. E., 1964, The Physics of Solar Flares, AAS-NASA Symp., NASA SP-50, ed. Hess, W. H., Greenbelt, Maryland, p. 425Google Scholar
Sweet, P. A., 1958, in IAU Symp. 6, Electromagnetic Phenomena in Cosmical Plasma, ed. Lehnert, B., p. 123Google Scholar