Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:06:57.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Earth's 2006 encounter with comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann: Products of nucleus fragmentation seen in closeup

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2006

Zdeněk Sekanina
Zdeněk Sekanina*
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The large numbers of nucleus fragments observed are a spectacular illustration of the process of cascading fragmentation in progress, a concept introduced to interpret the properties of the Kreutz system of sungrazers and comet D/1993 F2. The objective is to describe the fragmentation sequence and hierarchy of comet 73P, the nature of the fragmentation process and observed events, and the expected future evolution of this comet. The orbital arc populated by the fragments refers to an interval of 3.74 days in the perihelion time. This result suggests that they all could be products (but not necessarily first-generation fragments) of two 1995 events, in early September (involving an enormous outburst) and at the beginning of November. The interval of perihelion times is equivalent to a range of about 2.5 m/s in separation velocity or 0.00012 the Sun's attraction in nongravitational deceleration. Their combined effect suggests minor orbital momentum changes acquired during fragmentation and decelerations compatible with survival over two revolutions about the Sun. Fragment B is a likely first-generation product of one of the 1995 events. From the behavior of the primary fragment C, 73P is not a dying comet, even though fragment B and others were episodically breaking up into many pieces. Each episode began with the sudden appearance of a starlike nucleus condensation and a rapidly expanding outburst, followed by a development of jets, and a gradual tailward extension of the fading condensation, until the discrete masses embedded in it could be resolved. In April-May, this debris traveled first to the southwest, but models show their eventual motion toward the projected orbit. Fainter fragments were imaged over limited time, apparently because of their erratic activity (interspersed with periods of dormancy) rather than improptu disintegration. A dust trail joining the fragments and reminiscent of comet 141P/Machholz suggests that cascading fragmentation exerts itself profoundly over an extremely broad mass range of particulate debris.

Keywords

Cometfragmentationdata analysis
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 2 , Symposium S236: Near Earth Objects, our Celestial Neighbors: Opportunity and Risk , August 2006 , pp. 211 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2007

References

A'Hearn, M. F. and the Depp Impact Team 2005, Science 310, 258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehnhardt, H., & Käufl, H. U. 1995, IAU Circ. 6274Google Scholar
Boehnhardt, H., Holdstock, S., Hainaut, O., Tozzi, G. P., Benetti, S., & Licandro, J. 2002, Earth Moon Plan. 90, 131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehnhardt, H., Käufl, H. U., Goudfrooij, P., Storm, J., Manfroid, J., & Reinsch, K. 1996, ESO Messenger No. 84, p. 26Google Scholar
Crovisier, J., Bockelée-Morvan, D., Gérard, E., Rauer, H., Biver, N., Colom, P., & Jorda, L. 1996, AA 310, L17Google Scholar
Green, D. W. E., ed. 2000, IAU Circ. 7534Google Scholar
Green, D. W. E., ed. 2005, IAU Circ. 8623Google Scholar
Green, D. W. E., ed. 2006a, IAU Circ. 8659, 8660Google Scholar
Green, D. W. E., ed. 2006b, IAU Circ. 8679Google Scholar
Green, D. W. E., ed. 2006c, IAU Circ. 8685, 8692, 8693, 8703, 8704, 8709, 8715Google Scholar
Kreutz, H. 1888, Publ. Kiel Sternw. No. 3, p. 1Google Scholar
Marsden, B. G., ed. 1996a, IAU Circ. 6301Google Scholar
Marsden, B. G., ed. 1996b, Minor Planet Circ. 28339Google Scholar
Marsden, B. G., ed. 1997, Minor Planet Circ. 28917Google Scholar
Sekanina, Z. 1978, Icarus 33, 173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sekanina, Z. 1982, in: Wilkening, L. L. (ed.), Comets (Tucson: Univ. Arizona), p. 251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sekanina, Z. 1997, AA 318, L5Google Scholar
Sekanina, Z. 1999, AA 342, 285Google Scholar
Sekanina, Z. 2002, ApJ 566, 577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sekanina, Z. 2005, Internat. Comet Quart. 27, 225Google Scholar
Sekanina, Z., Chodas, P. W., & Yeomans, D.K. 1998, Planet. Space Sci. 46, 21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, M. V. & Walker, R. G. 1992, Icarus 95, 180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, H. A., Feldman, P. D., A'Hearn, M. F., Arpigny, C., Brown, R. A., Helin, E. F., Levy, D. H., Marsden, B. G., Meech, K. J., Larson, S. M., Noll, K. S., Scotti, J. V., Sekanina, Z., Shoemaker, C. S., Shoemaker, E. M., Smith, T. E., Storrs, A. D., Yeomans, D. K., & Zellner, B. 1994, Science 263, 787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whipple, F. L. 1950, ApJ 111, 375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whipple, F. L. 1963 in: Middlehurst, B. M. & Kuiper, G. P. (eds.), The Moon, Meteorites, and Comets (Chicago: Univ. Chicago), p. 639Google Scholar