Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T19:27:17.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Downsizing in HII galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2006

R. Terlevich ,
J. López  and
E. Terlevich
R. Terlevich
Affiliation:
Department of Astrophysics, INAOE, México. email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
J. López
Affiliation:
Department of Astrophysics, INAOE, México. email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
E. Terlevich
Affiliation:
Department of Astrophysics, INAOE, México. email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this work we estimated the statistical age of a set of HII galaxies obtained from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release Three (SDSS DR3). Applying an inversion method to the observed distribution of an age sensitive parameter such as the equivalent width of (Hα), we estimate the age of the galaxies. We find strong dependence of the age with stellar luminosity, mass and metallicity with the youngest HII galaxies being those with the lowest mass and metallicity. These dependences found among HII galaxies indicate that “downsizing” extends to the low end of the mass distribution of galaxies.

Keywords

galaxies: evolutionformationISM: HII regions
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 2 , Symposium S235: Galaxy Evolution Across the Hubble Time , August 2006 , pp. 284 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2007

References

Baldwin, J., Phillips, M., & Terlevich, R. 1981, PASP 93, 5 (BPT).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowie, L. L., Songaila, A., Hu, E. M., & Cohen, J. G. 1996, AJ 112, 839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denicoló, G., Terlevich, R.,& Terlevich, E. 2002, MNRAS 330, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, A. 2005, AJ 130, 1535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heavens, A., Panter, B., Jiménez, R., & Dunlop, J. 2004, Nature 428, 625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffmann, G. 2003, MNRAS 346, 1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kewley, L., Dopita, M. 2001, Apj 556, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., González-Delgado, R. M, Robert, C., Kune, D. F., de Mello, D. F., Devost, D., & Heckman, T. M. 1999, ApJS 123,3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitherer, C., & Heckman, T. 1995, ApJS 96, 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, Y. C., Hammer, F., & Flores, H. 2006, A&A 447, 113.Google Scholar
Maier, C. 2006, ApJ 638, 858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S. & White, S. D. M. 1995, MNRAS 275, 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panella, M. 2006, ApJ 639.Google Scholar
Silich, S., Tenorio-Tagle, T., Muñoz-Tuñon, C., & Cairos, L., 2002, Apj 123, 2438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terlevich, R., Silich, S., Rosa-González, D.,& Terlevich, E. 2004, MNRAS 348, 1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treu, T., Ellis, R. S., Liao, T. X., & Van Dokkum, P. G. 2005, ApJ 622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dokkum, P.G. 2004, ApJ 611, 703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, S. D., & Rees, M. J. 1978, MNRAS 183, 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, S. D. & Frenk, C. S. 1991, ApJ 379, 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar