Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:32:29.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

DIVISION IX / COMMISSION 25 / WORKING GROUP: INFRARED ASTRONOMY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2010

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The formal origin of the IRWG occured at the Buenos Aires General Assembly, following a Joint Commission meeting at the IAU GA in Baltimore in 1988 that identified the problems with ground-based infrared photometry. The situation is summarized in Milone (1989). In short, the challenges involved how to explain the failure to achieve the milli-magnitude precision expected of infrared photometry and an apparent 3% limit on system transformability. The proposed solution was to redefine the broadband Johnson system, the passbands of which had proven so unsatisfactory that over time effectively different systems proliferated, although bearing the same JHKLMNQ designations; the new system needed to be better positioned and centered in the atmospheric windows of the Earth's atmosphere, and the variable water vapour content of the atmosphere needed to be measured in real time to better correct for atmospheric extinction.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

van Dokkum, P. G., et al. 2009, PASP, 121, 28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hora, J. L., et al. 2008, PASP, 120, 12331243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milone, 1989, in: Milone, E. F. (ed.), Infrared Extinction and Standardization, Proc., Two Sessions of IAU Commissions 25 and 9, Baltimore, MD, USA, 4 August 1988, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 341 (Heidelberg: Springer), p. 1Google Scholar
Milone, E. F. & Young, A. T. 2005, PASP, 117, 485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milone, E. F. & Young, A. T. 2007, in: Sterken, C. (ed.), The Future of Photometric, Spectrophotometric, and Polarimetric Standardization, Proc. Intern. Workhop, Blankenberge, Belgium, 8-11 May 2006, ASP-CS, 364, 387Google Scholar
Milone, E. F. & Young, A. T. 2008, JRASC, 36, 110Google Scholar
Monson, A. J. & Pierce, M. J. 2009, PASP, 121, 728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez, S. F., et al. 2007, PASP, 120, 1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez, S. F., et al. 2008, PASP, 120, 1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, B. J. 2007, PASP, 119, 407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, B. J. 2008, PASP, 120, 602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, B. J. 2008b, PASP, 120, 1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tokunaga, A. T. & Vacca, W. D. 2007, in: Sterken, C. (ed.), The Future of Photometric, Spectrophotometric, and Polarimetric Standardization, Proc. Intern. Workhop, Blankenberge, Belgium, 8–11 May 2006, ASP-CS, 364, 409Google Scholar
Wood-Vasey, W. M., et al. 2008, ApJ, 689, 377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, A. T., Milone, E. F., & Stagg, C. R. 1994, A&AS, 105, 259Google Scholar