Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:36:04.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Direct Imaging of Exoplanets Living an Exciting Life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

G. Chauvin
G. Chauvin*
Affiliation:
UJF-Grenoble1/CNRS-INSU, Institut de Planétologie et d'Astrophysique de Grenoble UMR 5274, Grenoble, F-38041, France email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

With the development of high contrast imaging techniques and instruments, vast efforts have been devoted during the past decades to detect and characterize lighter, cooler and closer companions to nearby stars, and ultimately image new planetary systems. Complementary to other planet-hunting techniques, this approach has opened a new astrophysical window to study the physical properties and the formation mechanisms of brown dwarfs and planets. In this review, I will briefly describe the different observing techniques and strategies used, the main samples of targeted nearby stars, finally the main results obtained so far about exoplanet discoveries characterization of their physical properties, and study of their occurrence and possible formation and evolution mechanisms.

Keywords

planets and satellites: detectionformationdynamical evolution and stabilityatmospherestechniques: image processingspectroscopichigh angular resolution
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 10 , Issue S314: Young Stars & Planets Near the Sun , November 2015 , pp. 213 - 219
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2016 

References

Apai, D., Janson, M., Moro-Martín, A.et al. 2008, ApJ, 672, 1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beuzit, J.-L., Feldt, M., Dohlen, K.et al. 2008, SPIE, 7014, 18Google Scholar
Biller, B. A., Close, L. M., Masciadri, E.et al. 2007, ApJS, 173, 143Google Scholar
Biller, E., Liu, M., Wahhaj, Z.et al. 2013, ApJ, 777, 160Google Scholar
Boley, A. C. 2009, ApJ, 695, L53Google Scholar
Bowler, B. P., Liu, M., Shkolnik et al. 2013, ApJ, 774, 55Google Scholar
Bonnefoy, M., Boccaletti, A., Lagrange, A. M.et al. 2013a, A&A, 555, 107Google Scholar
Bonnefoy, M., Marleau, G., Galicher, R.et al. 2014, A&A, 567, L9Google Scholar
Brandt, T., Kuzuhara, M., McElwain, M. W.et al. 2014, ApJ, 794, 159Google Scholar
Chabrier, G., Johansen, A., JAnson, M. & Rafikov, R. 2014, PPVI proc., 914 pp., p.619–642Google Scholar
Chauvin, G., Thomson, M., Dumas, C.et al. 2003, A&A, 404, 157Google Scholar
Chauvin, G., Lagrange, A.-M., Dumas, C.et al. 2005, A&A, 438, L25Google Scholar
Chauvin, G., Lagrange, A.-M., Bonavita, M.et al. 2010, A&A, 509, 52Google Scholar
Chauvin, G., Lagrange, A.-M., Beust, H.et al., 2012, A&A, 542, 41Google Scholar
Chauvin, G., Vigan, A., Bonnefoy, M.et al. 2015, A&A, 573, 27Google Scholar
Chilcote, J., Barman, T., Fitzgerald, M. P.et al. 2015, ApJ, 798, L3Google Scholar
Carson, J., Thalmann, C., Janson, M.et al. 2013, ApJ, 763, L32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delorme, P., Lagrange, A.-M., Chauvin, G.et al. 2012, A&A, 539, 72Google Scholar
Heinze, A. N., Hinz, P. M., Sivanandam, S.et al. 2010a, ApJ, 714, 1551Google Scholar
Heinze, A. N., Hinz, P. M., Kenworthy, M.et al. 2010b, ApJ, 714, 1570Google Scholar
Janson, M., Bonavita, M., Klahr, H.et al. 2011, ApJ, 736, 89Google Scholar
Kalas, P., Graham, J. R., Chiang, E.et al. 2008, Science 322, 1345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasper, M., Apai, D., Janson, M. & Brandner, W. 2007, A&A, 472, 321Google Scholar
Kuzuhara, M., Tamura, M., Kudo, T.et al. 2013, ApJ, 774, 11Google Scholar
Lafrenière, D., Doyon, R., Marois, C.et al. 2007, ApJ, 670, 1367Google Scholar
Lagrange, A.-M., Gratadour, D., Chauvin, G.et al., 2009, A&A, 506, L972Google Scholar
Lagrange, A.-M., Boccaletti, A., Milli, J., et al., 2012, A&A, 542, L40Google Scholar
Lowrance, P. J., Becklin, E. E., Schneider, G.et al. 2005, AJ, 130, 1845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macintosh, B., Graham, J. R., Palmer, D.et al. 2008, SPIE, 7015, 18Google Scholar
Marley, M., Fortney, J., Hubickyj, O.et al. 2007, ApJ, 655, 541Google Scholar
Marois, C., Lafrenière, D., Doyon, R., Macintosh, B. & Nadeau, D. 2006, ApJ, 641, 556Google Scholar
Marois, C., Zuckerman, B., Konopacky, Q. M.et al. 2010, Nature 468, 1080Google Scholar
Masciadri, E., Mundt, R., Henning Th. & Alvarez, C. 2005, ApJ, 625, 1004Google Scholar
Mawet, D., Pueyo, L., Lawson, P.et al. 2012, SPIE, 8442, 04Google Scholar
Metchev, S. & Hillenbrand, L. 2009, ApJS, 181, 62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metchev, S. A., Heinze, A., Apai, D.et al. 2015, ApJ, 799, 154Google Scholar
Mordasini, C., Alibert, Y., Georgy, C. 2012, A&A, 547, 112Google Scholar
Neuhäuser, R., Guenther, E. W., Alves, J.et al. 2003, AN, 324, 535Google Scholar
Nielsen, E., Liu, M., Wahhaj, Z.et al. 2013, ApJ, 776, 4Google Scholar
Pueyo, L., Soummer, R., Hoffman, J.et al. 2015, ApJ, 803, 31Google Scholar
Rameau, J., Chauvin, G., Lagrange, A.-M.et al. 2013a, ApJ, 772, L15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rameau, J., Chauvin, G., Lagrange, A.-M.et al. 2013b, A&A, 553, 60Google Scholar
Soummer, R., Pueyo, L. & Larkin, J. 2012, ApJ, 755, L28Google Scholar
Torres, C.A.O., Quast, G.R., Melo, C.H.F. 2008 Handbook of Star Forming Regions Vol. II 757Google Scholar
Vigan, A., Patience, J., Marois, C.et al. 2012, A&A, 544, 9Google Scholar
Wahhaj, Z., Liu, M., Nielsen, E. L.et al. 2013, ApJ, 773, 179Google Scholar
Yamamoto, K., Matsuo, T., Shibai, H.et al. 2013, PASJ, 65, 90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, B. & Song, I. 2004, ARA&A, 42, 685Google Scholar