Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T18:45:24.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diffuse Cloud Models: Successes and Challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2014

E. Roueff ,
M. Ruaud ,
F. Le Petit ,
B. Godard  and
J. Le Bourlot
E. Roueff
Affiliation:
LUTh and UMR 8102, Observatoire de Paris, F 92190 Meudon, France email: [email protected]
M. Ruaud
Affiliation:
LUTh and UMR 8102, Observatoire de Paris, F 92190 Meudon, France email: [email protected]
F. Le Petit
Affiliation:
LUTh and UMR 8102, Observatoire de Paris, F 92190 Meudon, France email: [email protected]
B. Godard
Affiliation:
LUTh and UMR 8102, Observatoire de Paris, F 92190 Meudon, France email: [email protected]
J. Le Bourlot
Affiliation:
LUTh and UMR 8102, Observatoire de Paris, F 92190 Meudon, France email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present the general physical conditions thought to be present in diffuse interstellar clouds. The radiation field is driving the atomic to molecular transition and the resulting physical conditions. We focus on the recent observational signatures of significant values of the cosmic ionization rate (10−16 - 10−15 s−1) which should also impact the clues to Diffuse interstellar Bands.

Keywords

moleculescosmic ionizationinterstellar physics
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 9 , Symposium S297: The Diffuse Interstellar Bands , May 2013 , pp. 311 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Abgrall, H., Le Bourlot, J., Pineau Des Forets, G., et al. 1992, A&A, 253, 525Google Scholar
Benhabiles-Mezhoud, H., Kiener, J., Tatischeff, V., & Strong, A. W. 2013, ApJ, 763, 98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Luca, M., Gupta, H., Neufeld, D., et al. 2012, ApJL, 751, L37Google Scholar
Draine, B. T. 1978, ApJS, 36, 595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flagey, N., Goldsmith, P. F., Lis, D. C., et al. 2013, ApJ, 762, 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerin, M., de Luca, M., Goicoechea, J. R., et al. 2010, A&A, 521, L16Google Scholar
Gerin, M., Levrier, F., Falgarone, E., et al. 2012, Royal Society of London Philosophical Transactions Series A, 370, 5174Google Scholar
Godard, B., Falgarone, E., Gerin, M., et al. 2012, A&A, 540, A87Google Scholar
Goicoechea, J. R. & Le Bourlot, J. 2007, A&A, 467, 1Google Scholar
Gonzalez Garcia, M., Le Bourlot, J., Le Petit, F., & Roueff, E. 2008, A&A, 485, 127Google Scholar
Indriolo, N. & McCall, B. J. 2012, ApJ, 745, 91Google Scholar
Indriolo, N., Neufeld, D. A., Gerin, M., et al. 2012, ApJ, 758, 83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, E. B. & Tripp, T. M. 2011, ApJ, 734, 65Google Scholar
Koo, B.-C. 1997, ApJS, 108, 489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Bourlot, J., Le Petit, F., Pinto, C., Roueff, E., & Roy, F. 2012, A&A, 541, A76Google Scholar
Le Petit, F., Barzel, B., Biham, O., Roueff, E., & Le Bourlot, J. 2009, A&A, 505, 1153Google Scholar
Le Petit, F., Nehmé, C., Le Bourlot, J., & Roueff, E. 2006, ApJS, 164, 506Google Scholar
Le Petit, F., Roueff, E., & Herbst, E. 2004, A&A, 417, 993Google Scholar
Le Petit, F., Roueff, E., & Le Bourlot, J. 2002, A&A, 390, 369Google Scholar
Lique, F., Li, G., Werner, H.-J., & Alexander, M. H. 2011, J. Chem. Phys., 134, 231101Google Scholar
Liszt, H. 2003, A&A, 398, 621Google Scholar
McCall, B. J., Hinkle, K. H., Geballe, T., et al. 2002, ApJ, 567, 391Google Scholar
McCall, B. J., Huneycutt, A. J., Saykally, R., et al. 2003, Nature, 422, 500Google Scholar
Neufeld, D. A. 2010, ApJ, 708, 635Google Scholar
Neufeld, D. A., Goicoechea, J. R., Sonnentrucker, P., et al. 2010, A&A, 521, L10Google Scholar
Neufeld, D. A., Kaufman, M. J., Goldsmith, P. F., Hollenbach, D. J., & Plume, R. 2002, ApJ, 580, 278Google Scholar
Neufeld, D. A. & Wolfire, M. G. 2009, ApJ, 706, 1594Google Scholar
Padovani, M. & Galli, D. 2013, Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings, 34, 61Google Scholar
Rachford, B. L., Snow, T. P., Destree, J. D., et al. 2009, ApJS, 180, 125Google Scholar
Rimmer, P. B., Herbst, E., Morata, O., & Roueff, E. 2012, A&A, 537, A7Google Scholar
Röllig, M., Abel, N. P., Bell, T., et al. 2007, A&A, 467, 187Google Scholar
Sheffer, Y., Rogers, M., Federman, S. R., et al. 2008, ApJ, 687, 1075Google Scholar
Snow, T. P. & McCall, B. J. 2006, ARAA, 44, 367Google Scholar
Sonnentrucker, P., Neufeld, D. A., Phillips, T. G., et al. 2010, A&A, 521, L12Google Scholar
van Dishoeck, E. F. & Black, J. H. 1986, ApJS, 62, 109Google Scholar
Wiesemeyer, H., Güsten, R., Heyminck, S., et al. 2012, A&A, 542, L7Google Scholar