Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T18:34:40.303Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diagrams of stability of circumbinary planetary systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2015

Elena Popova
Elena Popova*
Affiliation:
Pulkovo Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Pulkovskoye ave. 65, Saint Petersburg 196140, Russia email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The stability diagrams in the “pericentric distance — eccentricity” plane of initial data are built and analyzed for Kepler-38, Kepler-47, and Kepler-64 (PH1). This completes a survey of stability of the known up to now circumbinary planetary systems, initiated by Popova & Shevchenko (2013), where the analysis was performed for Kepler-16, 34, and 35. In the diagrams, the planets appear to be “embedded” in the fractal chaos border; however, I make an attempt to measure the “distance” to the chaos border in a physically consistent way. The obtained distances are compared to those given by the widely used numerical-experimental criterion by Holman & Wiegert (1999), who employed smooth polynomial approximations to describe the border. I identify the resonance cells, hosting the planets.

Keywords

Celestial mechanicsplanetary systemsmethods: numerical
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 9 , Issue S310: Complex Planetary Systems , July 2014 , pp. 98 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Popova, E. & Shevchenko, I. 2013, ApJ, 769, 152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, M. & Wiegert, P. 1999, AJ, 117, 621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orosz, J., Welsh, W., Carter, J.et al. 2012, ApJ, 758, 82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orosz, J., Welsh, W., Carter, J.et al. 2012, Science, 337, 1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostov, V., McCullough, P., Hinse, T.et al. 2013, ApJ, 770, 52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Bremen, H., Udwadia, F., & Proskurowski, W. 1997, Physica D 101 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shevchenko, I. & Kouprianov, V. 2002, A&A, 394, 663Google Scholar
Kouprianov, V. & Shevchenko, I. 2003, A&A, 410, 749Google Scholar
Kouprianov, V. & Shevchenko, I. 2005, Icarus, 176, 224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melnikov, A. & Shevchenko, I. 1998, Sol. Sys. Res., 32, 480Google Scholar
Melnikov, A. & Shevchenko, I. 2003, JETP Lett., 77, 642Google Scholar