Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:56:26.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determination of the Intrinsic Scatter in the MBH–σ and MBH–Lbulge Relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2010

Kayhan Gültekin
Kayhan Gültekin*
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, 500 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We derive improved versions of the relations between supermassive black hole mass MBH and host-galaxy bulge velocity dispersion σ and luminosity L (the MBH–σ and MBH–Lbulge relations), based on ~ 50 MBH measurements and ~ 20 upper limits. Particular attention is paid to recovery of the intrinsic scatter (ϵ0) in both relations. We find the scatter to be significantly larger than estimated in most previous studies. The large scatter requires revision of the local black hole mass function, and it implies that there may be substantial selection bias in studies of the evolution of the MBH–σ and MBH–Lbulge relations. When only considering ellipticals, the scatter decreases. These results appear to be insensitive to a wide range of assumptions about the measurement errors and the distribution of intrinsic scatter. We also investigate the effects on the fits of culling the sample according to the resolution of the black hole's sphere of influence.

Keywords

galaxies: elliptical and lenticulargalaxies: bulgesblack hole physicsmethods: statistical
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 5 , Symposium S267: Co-Evolution of Central Black Holes and Galaxies , August 2009 , pp. 189 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Bernardi, M., Sheth, R. K., Nichol, R. C., Miller, C. J., Schlegel, D., Frieman, J., Schneider, D. P., Subbarao, M., York, D. G., & Brinkmann, J. 2006, AJ, 131, 2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, A. 1989, in Active Galactic Nuclei, ed. Osterbrock, D. E. & Miller, J. S. (Dordrecht: Kluwer), p. 217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabian, A. C. 1999, MNRAS, 308, L39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrarese, L. & Ford, H. 2005, Space Science Reviews, 116, 523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrarese, L. & Merritt, D. 2000, ApJ, 539, L9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gebhardt, K., Bender, R., Bower, G., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Filippenko, A. V., Green, R., Grillmair, C., Ho, L. C., Kormendy, J., Lauer, T. R., Magorrian, J., Pinkney, J., Richstone, D., & Tremaine, S. 2000, ApJ, 539, L13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gültekin, K., Richstone, D. O., Gebhardt, K., Lauer, T. R., Pinkney, J., Aller, M. C., Bender, R., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Filippenko, A. V., Green, R., Ho, L. C., Kormendy, J., & Siopis, C. 2009a, ApJ, 695, 1577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gültekin, K., Richstone, D. O., Gebhardt, K., Lauer, T. R., Tremaine, S., Aller, M. C., Bender, R., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Filippenko, A. V., Green, R., Ho, L. C., Kormendy, J., Magorrian, J., Pinkney, J., & Siopis, C. 2009b, ApJ, 698, 198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, P. F., Robertson, B., Krause, E., Hernquist, L., & Cox, T. J. 2006, ApJ, 652, 107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, A. 2003, ApJ, 596, L27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kormendy, J., 1993, in The Nearest Active Galaxies, eds. Beckman, J., Colina, L., & Netzer, H., (Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investicaciones Cientificas), p. 197Google Scholar
Lauer, T. R., Faber, S. M., Richstone, D., Gebhardt, K., Tremaine, S., Postman, M., Dressler, A., Aller, M. C., Filippenko, A. V., Green, R., Ho, L. C., Kormendy, J., Magorrian, J., & Pinkney, J. 2007, ApJ, 662, 808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauer, T. R., Tremaine, S., Richstone, D., & Faber, S. M. 2007, ApJ, 670, 249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magorrian, J., Tremaine, S., Richstone, D., Bender, R., Bower, G., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Gebhardt, K., Green, R., Grillmair, C., Kormendy, J., & Lauer, T. 1998, AJ, 115, 2285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marconi, A., Risaliti, G., Gilli, R., Hunt, L. K., Maiolino, R., & Salvati, M. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, C. Y., Impey, C. D., Rix, H.-W., Kochanek, C. S., Keeton, C. R., Falco, E. E., Lehár J., & McLeod, B. A. 2006, ApJ, 649, 616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richstone, D., 2004, in Coevolution of Black Holes and Galaxies, ed. Ho, L. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 280Google Scholar
Shen, J., Vanden Berk, D. E., Schneider, D. P., & Hall, P. B. 2008, AJ, 135, 928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, Y. & Kelly, B. C. 2009 [arXiv:0911.5208]Google Scholar
Shen, Y., Strauss, M. A., Oguri, M., Hennawi, J. F., Fan, X., Richards, G. T., Hall, P. B., Gunn, J. E., Schneider, D. P., Szalay, A. S., Thakar, A. R., Vanden Berk, D. E., Anderson, S. F., Bahcall, N. A., Connolly, A. J., & Knapp, G. R. 2007, AJ, 133, 2222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheth, R. K., Bernardi, M., Schechter, P. L., Burles, S., Eisenstein, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., Frieman, J., Lupton, R. H., Schlegel, D. J., Subbarao, M., Shimasaku, K., Bahcall, N. A., Brinkmann, J., & Ivezić, Ž. 2003, ApJ, 594, 225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silk, J. & Rees, M. J. 1998, A&A, 331, L1Google Scholar
Tremaine, S., Gebhardt, K., Bender, R., Bower, G., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Filippenko, A. V., Green, R., Grillmair, C., Ho, L. C., Kormendy, J., Lauer, T. R., Magorrian, J., Pinkney, J., & Richstone, D. 2002, ApJ, 574, 740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treu, T., Malkan, M. A., & Blandford, R. D. 2004, ApJ, 615, L97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treu, T., Woo, J.-H., Malkan, M. A., & Blandford, R. D. 2007, ApJ, 667, 117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vestergaard, M., Fan, X., Tremonti, C. A., Osmer, P. S., & Richards, G. T. 2008, ApJ, 674, L1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volonteri, M. 2007, ApJ, 663, L5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volonteri, M., Haardt, F., & Gültekin, K. 2008, MNRAS, 384, 1387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Q., & Tremaine, S. 2002, MNRAS, 335, 965CrossRefGoogle Scholar