Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:54:44.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The destruction of 3He by Rayleigh-Taylor instability on the first giant branch

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2006

Peter P. Eggleton
Affiliation:
Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Ave, Livermore, CA94551, USA email: [email protected], [email protected]
David S. P. Dearborn
Affiliation:
Physics and Allied Technologies Division Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Ave, Livermore, CA94551, USA email: [email protected], [email protected]
John C. Lattanzio
Affiliation:
Centre for Stellar and Planetary Astrophysics, Monash University, Australia email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Low-mass stars, ∼ 1–2 solar masses, near the Main Sequence are efficient at producing 3He, which they mix into the convective envelope on the giant branch and distribute into the Galaxy by way of envelope loss. This process is so efficient that it is difficult to reconcile the observed cosmic abundance of 3He with the predictions of Big Bang nucleosynthesis. In this paper we find, by modeling a red giant with a fully three-dimensional hydrodynamic code and a full nucleosynthetic network, that mixing arises in the supposedly stable and radiative zone between the hydrogen-burning shell and the base of the convective envelope. This mixing is due to Rayleigh-Taylor instability within a zone just above the hydrogen-burning shell. In this zone the burning of the 3He left behind by the retreating convective envelope is predominantly by the reaction 3He + 3He → 4He + 1H + 1H, a reaction which, untypically for stellar nuclear reactions, lowers the mean molecular weight, leading to a local minimum. This local minimum leads to Rayleigh-Taylor instability, and turbulent motion is generated which will continue ultimately up into the normal convective envelope. Consequently material from the envelope is dragged down sufficiently close to the burning shell that the He in it is progressively destroyed. Thus we are able to remove the threat that He production in low-mass stars poses to the Big Bang nucleosynthesis of 3He.

Some slow mixing mechanism has long been suspected, that connects the convective envelope of a red giant to the burning shell. It appears to be necessary to account for progressive changes in the C/C and N/C ratios on the First Giant Branch. We suggest that these phenomena are also due to the Rayleigh-Taylor-unstable character of the He-burning region.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2007

References

Bazán, G. et al. , 2003, in ‘3-D Stellar EvolutionTurcotte, S., Keller, S. C., Cavallo, R. M., Eds ASP conf. 293, p 1Google Scholar
Dearborn, D. S. P., Lattanzio, J. C. & Eggleton, P. P. 2006, ApJ 639, 405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dearborn, D. S. P., Steigman, G. & Schramm, D. 1986, ApJ 302, 35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dearborn, D. S. P., Steigman, G. & Tosi, M. 1996, ApJ 465, 887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggleton, P. P. et al. , 2003, in ‘3-D Stellar Evolution’ Turcotte, S., Keller, S. C., Cavallo, R. M.,Eds ASP conf. 293, p 15Google Scholar
Faulkner, J. 1966, ApJ 144, 978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulkner, J. 1972, ApJ 173, 401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hata, N. et al. , 1995, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iben, I. Jr, 1967, ApJ 147, 624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraft, R. P. 1994, PASP 106, 553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olive, K. A., Rood, R. T., Schramm, D. N., Truran, J. & Vangioni-Flam, E. 1995, ApJ 444, 680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steigman, G., Dearborn, D. S. P. & Schramm, D. (1986) in Nucleosynthesis and its implications on nuclear and particle physics, Audouze, J.Mathieu, N., Eds NATO ASI Series. Volume C163, p37Google Scholar
Suntzeff, N. 1993, in The globular clusters-galaxy connection, Smith, G. H., Brodie, J. P., Eds. ASPC 48, 167Google Scholar
Weiss, A. & Charbonnel, C. 2004, Mem. S. A. It. 75, 347Google Scholar