Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:33:15.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Definition and realization of the celestial intermediate reference system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2007

N. Capitaine
N. Capitaine*
Affiliation:
Observatoire de Paris, SYRTE, 61 avenue de l'Observatoire, 75014, Paris, France email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The transformation between the International Terrestrial Reference System (ITRS) and the Geocentric Celestial Reference system (GCRS) is an essential part of the models to be used when dealing with Earth's rotation or when computing directions of celestial objects in various systems. The 2000 and 2006 IAU resolutions on reference systems have modified the way the Earth orientation is expressed and adopted high accuracy models for expressing the relevant quantities for the transformation from terrestrial to celestial systems. First, the IAU 2000 Resolutions have refined the definition of the astronomical reference systems and transformations between them and adopted the IAU 2000 precession-nutation. Then, the IAU 2006 Resolutions have adopted a new precession model that is consistent with dynamical theories and have addressed definition, terminology or orientation issues relative to reference systems and time scales that needed to be specified after the adoption of the IAU 2000 resolutions. These in particular provide a refined definition of the pole (the Celestial intermediate pole, CIP) and the origin (the Celestial intermediate origin, CIO) on the CIP equator as well as a rigorous definition of sidereal rotation of the Earth. These also allow an accurate realization of the celestial intermediate system linked to the CIP and the CIO that replaces the classical celestial system based on the true equator and equinox of date. This talk explains the changes resulting from the joint IAU 2000/2006 resolutions and reviews the consequences on the concepts, nomenclature, models and conventions in fundamental astronomy that are suitable for modern and future realizations of reference systems. Realization of the celestial intermediate reference system ensuring a micro-arc-second accuracy is detailed.

Keywords

standardsastrometryephemeridesreference systemstimeEarth
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 3 , Symposium S248: A Giant Step: from Milli- to Micro-arcsecond Astrometry , October 2007 , pp. 367 - 373
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Capitaine, N., Guinot, B., & McCarthy, D.D., 2000, A&A 355, 398Google Scholar
Capitaine, N., Wallace, P. T., & Chapront, J., 2003, A&A 412, 567Google Scholar
Capitaine, N. & Wallace, P. T., 2006, A&A, 450, 855Google Scholar
Capitaine, & the IAU NFA WG, 2007, in Transactions of the IAU XXVIB, van der Hucht, K. A. (ed)Google Scholar
Guinot, B., 1979, in Time and the Earth's Rotation, McCarthy, D. D. and Pilkington, J. D. (eds), D. Reidel Publishing Company, 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilton, J., Capitaine, N., Chapront, J., et al. , Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astr. 94 3, 351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IAU, 1998, Transactions of the IAU XXIIIB, Anderson, J. (ed), 40Google Scholar
IAU 2000, Transactions of the IAU XXIVB; Manchester, Rickman, H. (ed), Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Provo, USA, 2001, pp. 34–58Google Scholar
IAU 2006, Transactions of the IAU XXVIB; van der Hucht, K. A. (ed)Google Scholar
IUGG 2007, IUGG Resolutions, http://www.iugg.org/resolutions/perugia07.pdf.Google Scholar
IERS Conventions (2003), IERS Technical Note 32, McCarthy, D. D. and Petit, G. (eds), Frankfurt am Main: Verlag des desamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie, 2004Google Scholar
Ma, C., Arias, E. F., Eubanks, et al. , 1998, A&A 116, 516Google Scholar
Mathews, P. M., Herring, T. A. & Buffett, B. A., 2002, J. Geophys. Res. 107, B4, 10.1029/2001JB000390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, D. D., Luzum, B. J., 2003, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astr. 85, 37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soffel, M., Klioner, S. A., Petit, et al. , 2003, AJ 126, 6, 2687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, P. T., 1998, in Highlights of Astronomy Vol. 11A, Andersen, J. (ed.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, 11, 191Google Scholar
Wallace, P. T., Capitaine, N., 2006, A&A 459, 3, 981Google Scholar