Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T10:48:49.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cyclic fluctuations in the differential rotation of active stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2006

Pascal Petit
Pascal Petit*
Affiliation:
Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées, 14 avenue Edouard Belin, F-31400 Toulouse, Franceemail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Differential rotation is described in stellar dynamo models as one of the fundamental phenomena governing the amplification of magnetic fields in active stars.Using indirect imaging methods, the measurement of photospheric differential rotation is now achieved on a growing number of very active stars, a fraction of which exhibit temporal fluctuations of potentially large amplitude in their latitudinal shear, on a time-scale of a few years. I first describe the modeling tools on which such analysis is based, then discuss the implications of this observational work on our understanding of stellar dynamos and of the impact stellar magnetic fields may have on the dynamics of convective envelopes.

Keywords

Stars: magnetic fieldsstars: late-typestars: rotation
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 2 , Highlights of Astronomy 14: Highlights of Astronomy , August 2006 , pp. 280 - 281
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2007

References

Applegate, J. H. 1992, ApJ, 385, 621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier Cameron, A., & Donati, J.-F. 2002, MNRAS, 329, 23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donati, J.-F., & Brown, S. F. 1997, A&A, 326, 1135Google Scholar
Donati, J.-F., Collier Cameron, A., & Petit, P. 2003, MNRAS, 345, 1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, R., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Hill, F., et al. 2000, Science, 287, 2456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, S. C., Waite, I.A., Carter, B. D., & Donati, J.-F. 2005, MNRAS, 359, 711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petit, P., Donati, J.-F., & Collier Cameron, A. 2002, MNRAS, 334, 374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petit, P., Donati, J.-F., Wade, G. A., et al. 2004a, MNRAS, 348, 1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petit, P., Donati, J.-F., Oliveira, J., et al. 2004b, MNRAS, 351, 826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semel, M. 1989, A&A, 225, 456Google Scholar
Vogt, S. S., & Penrod, G. D. 1983, PASP, 95, 565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorontsov, S. V., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Schou, J., et al. 2002, Science, 296, 101CrossRefGoogle Scholar