Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:50:39.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Current-Driven Kink Instability in Relativistic Jets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2011

Yosuke Mizuno
Affiliation:
CSPAR, The University of Alabama in Huntsville, 320 Sparkman Drive, NSSTC, Huntsville, AL 35805, USA email: [email protected]
Philip E. Hardee
Affiliation:
Dept. Physics and Astronomy, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA
Yuri Lyubarsky
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel
Ken-Ici Nishikawa
Affiliation:
CSPAR, The University of Alabama in Huntsville, 320 Sparkman Drive, NSSTC, Huntsville, AL 35805, USA email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We have investigated the development of current-driven (CD) kink instability in relativistic jets via 3D RMHD simulations. In this investigation a static force-free equilibrium helical magnetic field configuration is considered in order to study the influence of the initial configuration on the linear and nonlinear evolution of the instability. We found that the initial configuration is strongly distorted but not disrupted by the CD kink instability. The linear growth and nonlinear evolution of the CD kink instability depends moderately on the radial density profile and strongly on the magnetic pitch profile. Kink amplitude growth in the nonlinear regime for decreasing magnetic pitch leads to a slender helically twisted column wrapped by magnetic field. On the other hand, kink amplitude growth in the nonlinear regime nearly ceases for increasing magnetic pitch.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Appl, S., Lery, T., & Baty, H. 2000 A&A 355, 818Google Scholar
Bateman, G. 1978, MHD Instabilities (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), p. 270Google Scholar
Baty, H. 2005 A&A 430, 9Google Scholar
Begelman, M. C. 1998 ApJ 493, 291Google Scholar
Blandford, R. D. & Payne, D. G. 1982, MNRAS 199, 883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blandford, R. D. & Znajek, R. L. 1977, MNRAS 179, 433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardee, P., Mizuno, Y., & Nishikawa, K.-I. 2007 Ap&SS 311, 283Google Scholar
Hawley, J. F. & Krolik, J. H. 2006, ApJ 641, 103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyubarskii, Y. E., 1999 MNRAS 208, 1006Google Scholar
McKinney, J. C. 2006, MNRAS 368, 1561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mizuno, Y., Lyubarsky, Y., Nishikawa, K.-I., & Hardee, P. E. 2009 ApJ 700, 684Google Scholar
Mizuno, Y., Nishikawa, K.-I., Koide, S., Hardee, P., & Fishman, G. J. 2006 ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints 0609004Google Scholar
Narayan, R., Li, J., & Tchekhovskoy, A. 2009, ApJ 697, 1681CrossRefGoogle Scholar