Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:13:01.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CSI in Supernova Remnants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2017

You-Hua Chu*
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Supernovae (SNe) explode in environments that have been significantly modified by the SN progenitors. For core-collapse SNe, the massive progenitors ionize the ambient interstellar medium (ISM) via UV radiation and sweep the ambient ISM via fast stellar winds during the main sequence phase, replenish the surroundings with stellar material via slow winds during the luminous blue variable (LBV) or red supergiant (RSG) phase, and sweep up the circumstellar medium (CSM) via fast winds during the Wolf-Rayet (WR) phase. If a massive progenitor was in a close binary system, the binary interaction could have caused mass ejection in certain preferred directions, such as the orbital plane, and even bipolar outflow/jet. As a massive star finally explodes, the SN ejecta interacts first with the CSM that was ejected and shaped by the star itself. As the newly formed supernova remnant (SNR) expands further, it encounters interstellar structures that were shaped by the progenitor from earlier times. Therefore, the structure and evolution of a SNR is largely dependent on the initial mass and close binarity of the SN progenitor. The Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) has an excellent sample of over 50 confirmed SNRs that are well resolved by Hubble Space Telescope, Chandra X-ray Observatory, and Spitzer Space Telescope. These multi-wavelength observations allow us to conduct stellar forensics in SNRs and understand the wide variety of morphologies and physical properties of SNRs observed.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2017 

References

Brandner, W., Chu, Y.-H., Eisenhauer, F., Grebel, E. K., & Points, S. D. 1997, ApJL, 489, L153 Google Scholar
Caraveo, P., Mignani, R., & Bignami, G. B. 1998, Mem. Soc. Astronomia Italiana, 69, 1061 Google Scholar
Castor, J., McCray, R., & Weaver, R. 1975, ApJL, 200, L107 Google Scholar
Chevalier, R. A., Kirshner, R. P., & Raymond, J. C. 1980, ApJ, 235, 186 Google Scholar
Güdel, M., Briggs, K. R., Montmerle, T., et al. 2008, Science, 319, 309 Google Scholar
Hughes, J. P., Hayashi, I., Helfand, D., et al. 1995, ApJL, 444, L81 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iben, I. Jr, & Tutukov, A. V. 1984, ApJS, 54, 335 Google Scholar
Li, C.-J., Chu, Y.-H., Gruendl, R. A., et al. 2017, ApJ, 836, 85 Google Scholar
Nazé, Y., Chu, Y.-H., Points, S. D., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 921 Google Scholar
Nomoto, K. 1982, ApJ, 257, 780 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, S., Hughes, J. P., Slane, P. O., et al. 2012, ApJ, 748, 117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rest, A., Matheson, T., Blondin, S., et al. 2008, ApJ, 680, 1137 Google Scholar
Rest, A., Suntzeff, N. B., Olsen, K., et al. 2005, Nature, 438, 1132 Google Scholar
Sandin, C., Lundqvist, P., Lundqvist, N., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 432, 2854 Google Scholar
Vogt, F. & Dopita, M. A. 2011, Ap. & Space Sci., 331, 521 Google Scholar
Walborn, N. R., Lasker, B. M., Laidler, V. G., & Chu, Y.-H. 1987, ApJL, 321, L41 Google Scholar
Warren, J. S., Hughes, J. P., & Slane, P. O. 2003, ApJ, 583, 260 Google Scholar
Weaver, R., McCray, R., Castor, J., Shapiro, P., & Moore, R. 1977, ApJ, 218, 377 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webbink, R. F. 1984, ApJ, 277, 355 Google Scholar
Whelan, J. & Iben, I. Jr, 1973, ApJ, 186, 1007 Google Scholar