Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:52:18.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cosmology and the subclasses of the gamma-ray bursts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2011

Attila Mészáros
Affiliation:
Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Astronomical Institute, Prague, Czech Republic, email: [email protected]; [email protected]
István Horváth
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, Bolyai Military University, Budapest, POB 15, H-1581, Hungary, email: [email protected]
Jakub Řípa
Affiliation:
Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Astronomical Institute, Prague, Czech Republic, email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Zsolt Bagoly
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics of Complex Systems, Eötvös University, H-1117 Budapest, Pázmány P. s. 1/A, Hungary, email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Lajos G. Balázs
Affiliation:
Konkoly Observatory, Budapest, POB 67, H-1525, Hungary, email: [email protected]
Péter Veres
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, Bolyai Military University, Budapest, POB 15, H-1581, Hungary, email: [email protected] Dept. of Physics of Complex Systems, Eötvös University, H-1117 Budapest, Pázmány P. s. 1/A, Hungary, email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Several statistical studies - done also by the authors of this contribution - show that there are three subclasses of gamma-ray bursts. They can be called as short, intermediate and long ones, because they can be separated with respect to their durations. The short and intermediate bursts are distributed anisotropically on the sky. This behavior is highly remarkable, and can have a cardinal impact on the cosmology. The subject of this contribution is a survey of this topic.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Balázs, L. G., Mészáros, A. & Horváth, I. 1998, A&A, 339, 1Google Scholar
Balázs, L. G. et al. 1999, A&A. Suppl.Ser., 138, 417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balázs, L. G. et al. 2003, A&A, 401, 129Google Scholar
Hakkila, J. et al. 2003, ApJ, 582, 320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horváth, I. 1998, ApJ, 508, 757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horváth, I. 2002, A&A, 392, 791Google Scholar
Horváth, I. 2009, Ap&SS, 323, 83Google Scholar
Horváth, I., Mészáros, P. & Mészáros, A. 1996, ApJ, 470, 56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horváth, I. et al. 2006, A&A, 447, 23Google Scholar
Horváth, I. et al. 2008, A&A, 489, L1Google Scholar
Horváth, I. et al. 2010, ApJ, 713, 552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huja, D., Mészáros, A. & Řípa, J. 2009, A&A, 504, 67Google Scholar
Mészáros, A. & Mészáros, P. 1996, ApJ, 466, 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mészáros, A. et al. 2000, ApJ, 539, 98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mészáros, A. et al. 2006, A&A, 455, 785Google Scholar
Mészáros, A. et al. 2009a, GRB: Sixth Huntsville Symp., AIP Conf. Proc., 1133, 483Google Scholar
Mészáros, A. et al. 2009b, Baltic Astronomy, 18, 293Google Scholar
Mukherjee, S. et al. 1998, ApJ, 508, 314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Řípa, J. et al. 2009, A&A, 498, 399Google Scholar
Vavrek, R. et al. 2008, MNRAS, 391, 1741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veres, P. et al. 2010, ApJ, forthcoming, astro-ph/1010.2087Google Scholar